The Land of Obama Make-Believe

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 20, 2012 07:32 AM


Official White House photo

The Land of Obama Make-Believe
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2012

Where did President Obama go after killing off thousands of Keystone XL pipeline construction and manufacturing jobs? Why, Disney World, of course. Sabotaging work is hard work for Goofy and his pals.

And where’d he head after that? Why, up to Manhattan for more high-priced campaign fundraisers charging up to $38,500 per partier. The business of wining and dining politically connected donors ain’t child’s play, you know.

Obama touted a White House foreign tourism initiative on Thursday with Cinderella’s castle as his backdrop. “America is open for business,” he proclaimed chirpily to the rest of the globe.

Tell that to the Keystone managers in Canada whom Obama and his State Department rebuffed — after years of planning and review — in order to appease militant environmentalists and Hollywood celebs. The Animatronic Divider robotically lambasted Republicans for pushing him to make a decision this week. But Senate and House Democrats issued the sharpest rebukes to White House obstructionism:

“President Obama’s decision on the Keystone XL pipeline is a major setback for the American economy, American workers, and America’s energy independence,” Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.V., said.

“The rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline permit is a missed opportunity to drastically turn this economy around. This pipeline would have created thousands of new jobs and helped to ensure our energy independence,” Rep. Jason Altmire, D-Pa., lamented.

“This delay is just playing politics with American jobs and American energy security,” Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, pointed out.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle scratched their heads as the job-snuffer-in-chief bolted to Orlando’s fantasyland to promote economic growth. But there’s no more fitting place on Earth for the man whose escapist administration occupies the land of make-believe and no consequences. (Bonus moment: Obama got to shake hands with Mickey Mouse, who infamously turned up on a Florida ACORN voter registration form in 2008. Constituent outreach at its most surreal.)

On the very same day he quashed Keystone, Obama released his first campaign ad of 2012 — hyping his stellar record on energy jobs. It’s Opposite Day at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, 365 days a year. Even more comically, the ad touted his exemplary ethics record by quoting a moldy three-year-old endorsement from left-leaning Politifact. And as bipartisan Capitol Hill outrage over the half-billion-dollar Solyndra solar stimulus bust mounts, Obama had the nerve to sprinkle his inaugural campaign spot with — wait for it — solar panels.

Instead of supporting new infrastructure jobs in America through an energy independence-enhancing project that has bipartisan legislative support on Capitol Hill, the president flew to Disney World to peddle looser visa restrictions in China and Brazil by executive order. He also will expand the Visa Waiver Program (a security loophole-ridden program that was suspended temporarily after the 9/11 terrorist attacks) to speed foreign travel.

In case anyone needs reminding, it was the relentless drive of the tourism industry and kowtowing State Department bureaucrats that led to the Bush-era Visa Express Program, which relaxed visa policies, eliminated in-person consulate interviews and opened the door to the 9/11 hijackers. Brazil is just the latest base for al-Qaida and other Islamic jihadi groups. It does not consider Hezbollah or Hamas terrorist groups, and it disbanded its anti-terrorism force in 2009.

The Visa Waiver Program and other efforts to expedite the tourist visa process also pose continuing security risks because — as the Government Accountability Office itself admitted last year — there is still no comprehensive, systematic way to track the 70 million-plus foreign visitors who enter the country on tourist and other short-term visas. Indeed, half of the nation’s estimated 20 million illegal aliens are visa overstayers.

How many of the new Disney foreign tourists whom Obama is touting as America’s economic salvation will fail to return to their home countries after their Obama World visas expire? We’ll likely never know. And Team Obama doesn’t care.

In his opening campaign ad salvo, Obama accuses his opponents of being “untethered to facts.” But this is an administration that believes lowering visa standards and risking homeland security to pump up Disney foreign tourism is a better path to economic recovery than supporting direct American job creation and enhancing energy security. Like the Disney characters he posed with this week, our cartoonish president is wholly untethered to reality.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #201
    On January 20th, 2012 at 6:17 pm, swede said:

    Pasadena Phil said:

    You know, these threads used to be very Tea Party friendly. Now we are treated even worse than Obama supporters.

    This meme that you think you’re the only conservative here is arrogant, insulting, disingenuous and just plain tedious, Mr Tea Party. Please consider FilAmWIguy’s post #196. Your condescending rhetoric only alienates people, and is divisive. I also agree a third party could be a very positive step, but in addition to Fil’s rantette, ;-) A third party at this point with:

    No credible leadership
    No credible candidate
    No conservative consensus
    No platform
    No plurality mandate
    No money

    Has zero substance and only mucks this mess up worse.

    More to the point – your condescending “uber” conservative pseudo high ground is naught but hypocritical blather. Character still matters – Big time! Traditional family values, visionary leadership, morality, ethics, integrity, veracity, consistancy are more important now than ever. This crap that social conservatism and morality are passe is just brain dead. The president can’t do anything about Roe, but he/she needs to know abortion destroys a human life – marriage involves a man and a woman – and for God’s sake he needs to know there is a God. As critical as the deficit, the economy, free markets and borders are – THEY ARE NOT THE ONLY ISSUES.

    That said, IMAO the best prospects out there were Palin, Bachmann and perhaps Cain – which is exactly why the libromedia brought their big guns to bear on them. Scares their socks off.

    Real conservatives know that. You, not so much.

  2. #202
    On January 20th, 2012 at 6:28 pm, conservative hispanic said:

    swede:

    Your points are the same ones I’ve been trying to tell Phil for the last two weeks. Still no answer from him on how his mythical third party can somehow magically win in November 2012.

  3. #203
    On January 20th, 2012 at 6:33 pm, CO_Engineer said:

    On January 20th, 2012 at 3:03 pm, IlovemycountryinAfrica said:
    The Greatest Man on the Planet

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6uHR90Sq6k&feature=g-logo&context=G2931468FOAAAAAAAAAA

    Looks like Obama has finally found something he is qualified to do (but still had to use a teleprompter). I look forward to him headlining his new gig in Vegas starting Jan 21, 2013.

  4. #204
    On January 20th, 2012 at 7:02 pm, swede said:

    conservative hispanic said:
    Your points are the same ones I’ve been trying to tell Phil for the last two weeks. Still no answer from him on how his mythical third party can somehow magically win in November 2012.

    I know, just reinforcing the obvious. Don’t confuse the boy with facts, his mind is made up!

    “Phil, I respectfully disagree.”

    “MONKEY PILE! Noseholders! Liberals! Idiots! Raiders fans!”

    Guess I got carried away with the last one. Phil reminds me of The man who is alternately rude and polite.

  5. #205
    On January 20th, 2012 at 7:23 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Okay, You convinced me. No one here cares what I think. RIGHT! You people have so little to discuss that you obsess about anything I say. I OWN you people.

    It really doesn’t make any difference how many of you join into the monkey pile. If even one of you had an argument to my points, you would be making it. But you don’t so, well trained by Saul Alinsky, you attack ME. Don’t you get it yet? You are phonies and hypocrites.

    Like the dimwitted sheeple you are, you find comfort in numbers in your monkey piles and appeal to Michelle to kick me out. Why don’t even ONE of you sheeple break from the pack and dare to think for yourself. What exactly do you expect to be talking about from now until November? Hatred of Obama only goes so far.

    Get a life.

  6. #206
    On January 20th, 2012 at 7:49 pm, babiesgrandma said:

    PPhil – I just saw a pic of you. You are so calm on the other site. Why are you reluctant to relax a little over here?

    I don’t think calling everyone here a bunch of names is the way to make any valid points.

    Calm down. I am not a sheeple. I love the fact that we all have opinions.

    But you know what? The field has been picked – go work on 2016 elections NOW. What we have is what we have. Calm down.

  7. #207
    On January 20th, 2012 at 8:01 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    (red meat) Go Ron Paul! (snicker)

  8. #208
    On January 20th, 2012 at 8:08 pm, txvet2 said:

    On January 20th, 2012 at 7:23 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Several lies, as usual when you get hysterical.

  9. #209
    On January 20th, 2012 at 8:16 pm, conservative hispanic said:

    Pasadena Phil:

    I asked a question, and that’s a monkey pile? Please explain that one, because I’m confused.

    I have never asked for your being kicked out. I’m not a sheeple. I can think for myself. Just because I’m not interested at charging at windmills it doesn’t follow that I’m an Alinskyite. So please calm down.

    So again I ask you: How does your mythical third party is supposed to win in November 2012? And I want details, please.

  10. #210
    On January 20th, 2012 at 8:22 pm, txvet2 said:

    On January 20th, 2012 at 8:16 pm, conservative hispanic said:

    I have never asked for your being kicked out.

    Nobody ever has, as far as I know. Just one of the many lies in that particular rant. Of course tomorrow he’ll be back claiming he never lies and demanding that you prove otherwise.

  11. #211
    On January 20th, 2012 at 8:32 pm, OK_Loyalist said:

    I’m the one being asked to be tossed out, mostly by Phil fans.

  12. #212
    On January 20th, 2012 at 8:34 pm, swede said:

    Pasadena Phil said:

    If even one of you had an argument to my points, you would be making it. But you don’t so, well trained by Saul Alinsky, you attack ME.

    Well, I’m so sorry – I thought this from my previous post might be addressing your third party recommendation. Maybe you could clarify what myself, HC, tv2 and others have asked you:

    A third party at this point with:

    No credible leadership – Who’s our chairman? Committee? Headquarters?
    No credible candidate – Paul won’t even do it. Ross Perot is unavailable.
    No conservative consensus – Witness present discourse.
    No platform – Tea Party? What does that mean? Only smaller government?
    No plurality mandate – No groundswell support and no traction with indies.
    No money – As in, “No dough – No go.”

    Help us sheeple out, O wise one. Or perhaps you could challenge me own tedious meme about social conservatism, values, character, morality, integrity and all that rot. Am I wrong? Why?

    BTW, If anyone indeed called for your removal, I’ll email tonight to back you. I agree with most of your ideas. The rest helps me define and articulate what I believe. That’s how this works. May I offer that you are rather thin skinned, intransigent and take yourself too seriously. Much of what I post is intended as sparring jabs – not personal condemnation. FWIW. Lighten up.

  13. #213
    On January 20th, 2012 at 8:34 pm, Mike2011 said:

    I would be pissed if I saved up for my family to visit Disney World, only to learn the Magic Kingdom is closed so this clown could make a speech.

  14. #214
    On January 20th, 2012 at 8:38 pm, Mike2011 said:

    From another website..

    “I am on vacation in Orlando at Disney World. We are celebrating the birthdays of two of our grandchildren. They love Disney World.

    Recently, it was announced that our president would be making a speech at the Magic Kingdom on Thursday. Something about promoting tourism. Later, it was announced that the speech would be around 12:30 p.m. It was now just announced that the Magic Kingdom will be closed Thursday until 3 p.m. and all reservations will be canceled.

    Lucky for us, our birthday celebration is not until Saturday. Others are not so fortunate. How would you like to have your little 4-year-old at Disney World for her birthday and have a reservation with her favorite princess at Cinderella’s castle? Too bad for you. Nice work Obama.

    So, if you see the evening news and a picture of him giving a speech at the Magic Kingdom, you will now know that it was just a photo op. No “regular people” were even allowed into the park. It was all staged.

    But what else would you expect from this president.”

  15. #215
    On January 20th, 2012 at 8:43 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On January 20th, 2012 at 4:00 pm, Pasadena Phil said:
    No one cares what I think?
    Apparently you do!

    Why? Because I read some of your posts? I also read ILMC’s posts. But do I care what she says? Nah, not so much. As has been said before, you are the “cut and paste poster”, just repeating the same mantra over and over. Boring.

  16. #216
    On January 20th, 2012 at 8:49 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Sally Kohn? I saw her on there one day but didn’t realize who she was. I only know that I couldn’t stand her from her very first word.

    Keep it up, FoxNews and you too can have the same ratings as MSNBC.

    There are a few shows I tune into. Fox and Friends in the a.m. as I wake up and catch up on the news. Then, Neil Cavuto, The Five, Bret Bair. Sometimes O’Reilly if he promises good guests. That’s it.

    What a shame that the one station we had to rely on getting the truth is more and more going over to the dark side. They are probably trying to be “fair and balanced”. But why resort to the most disgusting pieces of regressive crap? Sally Kohn, Alan Colmes, Bob Beckel, Juan Williams, etc. Most of them are unwatchable. Bob Beckel is pretty much neutralized by the rest of The Five, so he is palatable.

    Fox better wake up or they will be sorry when their fans leave in droves.

  17. #217
    On January 20th, 2012 at 9:23 pm, WaterBoyz said:

    Hey, didn’t Disney get ObumerCare waivers

  18. #218
    On January 20th, 2012 at 9:25 pm, knucklehead said:

    I am down to 2 shows on Fox – Cavuto and Bair. That is it. If they leave or turn all squishy then I will not watch any news on TV and will just get it from a few web sites and Rush. That is why there is such an effort to be able to control the content on the web and talk radio. I believe a lot of people are doing the same thing.

  19. #219
    On January 20th, 2012 at 9:29 pm, swede said:

    Mike2011 said:

    It was now just announced that the Magic Kingdom will be closed Thursday until 3 p.m. and all reservations will be canceled.

    Heh. “Hey all you tourists who traveled half way around the planet to visit Disney – Sorry, we’re closed today so our Dear Leader can announce we’re OPEN FOR BUSINESS!! Isn’t that great!”

  20. #220
    On January 20th, 2012 at 9:36 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On January 20th, 2012 at 9:29 pm, swede said:

    I am frankly quite floored by the audacity of this egomaniac to think no one would complain about this! Who the h does he think he is? However, the more people he pisses off, the better chance we have of tossing his sorry, skinny little ass out of our House in January!!

  21. #221
    On January 20th, 2012 at 9:51 pm, Green eyed Lady said:

    On January 20th, 2012 at 8:49 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Sally Kohn?

    Glad everyone caught my heads up.
    FOX… they used to be a conservative news network.
    ***
    Video: Canadian Talk Show Host Destroys Obama Over Keystone Decision

    Ezra Levant hosts a show, The Source, for Canada’s Sun News. In a very well-researched presentation, he takes a comprehensive look at Obama’s idiocy over the Keystone Pipeline. Be sure to watch the whole thing and pay particular attention to the map of the alleged “pristine, environmentally sensitive area” through which the pipleline will pass. I don’t know who this guy is, but he certainly did his homework.

    http://conservatives4palin.com/2012/01/video-canadian-talk-show-host-destroys-obama-over-keystone-decision.html

  22. #222
    On January 20th, 2012 at 10:22 pm, swede said:

    happyscrapper said:

    I am frankly quite floored by the audacity of this egomaniac to think no one would complain about this!

    Ranks up there with Billy Jeff Clintoon shutting down LAX for two hours so he could get a haircut on Air Force One parked on the tarmac. No takeoffs or landings permitted when POTUS is onboard. What. A. Shmuck.

  23. #223
    On January 21st, 2012 at 1:10 am, Papa Louie said:

    Oh how the mighty have fallen!
    From a Greek God in front of marble pillars on Mount Olympus to
    an ugly step-sister seeking relevance in front of Cinderella’s Castle.

  24. #224
    On January 21st, 2012 at 10:57 am, floridaobserver said:

    On January 20th, 2012 at 3:26 pm, Marshall_Will said:

    I think of Sir Alec Guiness in BOTRK. “Oh my God… what have I ‘done’?!”

    Took me a minute to think….LOVE that movie. BTW I think AMC has had a marathon Nazi/French resistance movies. Timely, I think. Also, doesn’t part 2 of Atlas Shrugged come out April 15th?

  25. #225
    On January 21st, 2012 at 12:10 pm, TigerLady said:

    I OWN you people.

    That’ll be the day.

  26. #226
    On January 21st, 2012 at 12:50 pm, Flyoverman said:
  27. #227
    On January 21st, 2012 at 10:38 pm, Rufus Levin said:

    Dear Michelle,

    I joined this blog group thinking that because it was YOURS that it would have a lot of thoughtful and articulate conservative posters…especially since you had restricted the members and hand picked who would stay early on.

    Frankly, it appears that there are only about 20 people that keep running dialog and diatribe arguments with each other filled with insults and petty disagreements….they might as well be twittering with each other or some group of high school kids texting.

    I am leaving this thing out of disgust, and frankly, have to say that it taints my attitude toward the charisma that Hannidy and Fox have attributed to you as a intelligent outspoken conservative. I find most of your comments today to be small minded, highly abrasive and adversarial, and somewhat generally misinformed.

    Have a nice life, and same to group.

    Rufus Levin.

  28. #228
    On January 22nd, 2012 at 9:43 am, michiganconservative said:

    Sally ‘Jane Hathaway’ Kohn? With all of her laughing and smirking when any other opinion other than her’s is presented, she is unwatchable.

  29. #229
    On January 22nd, 2012 at 9:49 am, thejim said:

    On January 21st, 2012 at 10:38 pm, Rufus Levin said:
    Dear Michelle,

    I joined this blog group thinking that because it was YOURS that it would have a lot of thoughtful and articulate conservative posters…especially since you had restricted the members and hand picked who would stay early on.

    Frankly, it appears that there are only about 20 people that keep running dialog and diatribe arguments with each other filled with insults and petty disagreements….they might as well be twittering with each other or some group of high school kids texting.

    I am leaving this thing out of disgust, and frankly, have to say that it taints my attitude toward the charisma that Hannidy and Fox have attributed to you as a intelligent outspoken conservative. I find most of your comments today to be small minded, highly abrasive and adversarial, and somewhat generally misinformed.

    Have a nice life, and same to group.

    Rufus Levin.

    Damn it! Rufus will be missed.
    sarc

  30. #230
    On January 22nd, 2012 at 10:14 am, stillontheroad said:

    On January 21st, 2012 at 10:38 pm, Rufus Levin said:
    Why how condescending of you! Under the guise of a thoughtful observance, you masked then exposed your your true intention! Hell, the Trojan Horse has nothing on you slick. Now, back to Media matters or Huffy Puffy or where ever you climbed out from under.

  31. #231
    On January 22nd, 2012 at 1:12 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    Rufus,
    DLTDHYWTGLSY

  32. #232
    On January 22nd, 2012 at 1:21 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On January 21st, 2012 at 10:38 pm, Rufus Levin said:

    Buh
    Bye

  33. #233
    On January 22nd, 2012 at 4:45 pm, swede said:

    Rufus Levin said:

    I am leaving this thing out of disgust, and frankly, have to say that it taints my attitude toward the charisma that Hannidy and Fox have attributed to you as a intelligent outspoken conservative. I find most of your comments today to be small minded, highly abrasive and adversarial, and somewhat generally misinformed.

    Have a nice life, and same to group.

    No, Dufus, please don’t go! We don’t have enough condescending, holier-than-thou, uber intellectual, arrogant and disingenuous commenters here. What will we ever do without your ultra-conservatism as a shining beacon to strive for? I think I’m gonna cry.

    Also. Don’t let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya. Putz.

  34. #234
    On January 22nd, 2012 at 5:40 pm, conservative hispanic said:

    Rufus Levin:

    You will NOT be missed. Just take ILMC and the other trash out with you.

  35. #235
    On January 22nd, 2012 at 5:56 pm, Wade said:

    Disgusting

  36. #236
    On January 22nd, 2012 at 6:21 pm, Blackstone said:

    Looks like Rufus’ sourpuss opus failed to move us.

    9-)

  37. #237
    On January 22nd, 2012 at 8:30 pm, Paratus said:

    Woooo Rufus you’ve really hurt my feelings.

  38. #238
    On January 22nd, 2012 at 11:02 pm, Dimsdale said:

    On January 20th, 2012 at 1:39 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    Okay, so let me see if this makes sense – Newt says he would not obey the Supreme Court if they made “the wrong decision” – um…. who’s to say what’s right and what’s wrong?

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/01/19/gingrich-suggests-he-will-ignore-roe-v-wade/

    Why would anyone support this guy?

    I guess you have to be a conservative to find this rational acceptable.

    So let me see if this makes sense: Øbama swore to support and defend the Constitution, yet he routinely ignores it and disobeys the intent of it, not to mention weakening the country at every opportunity.

    Why would anyone support this guy?

    I guess you have to be a liberal/socialist/South American dictator to find this rational acceptable.

  39. #239
    On January 22nd, 2012 at 11:03 pm, Dimsdale said:

    It’s “rationale”, by the way. I cut and pasted your tripe. My bad.

  40. #240
    On January 23rd, 2012 at 9:03 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    The Land of Obama Make-Believe
    By Michelle Malkin • January 20, 2012 07:32 AM

    I believe that “The Land of Obama Make-Believe” includes the issue of
    his (in)eligibility.

    Thankfully, at least one Judge appears to care about about the truth and the Constitution.

    ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS

    Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.

    In support of his motion, Defendant argues that “if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States” to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant’s motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is “unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony … [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced.” Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-l-2-.19(5).

    Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena. However, the Court’s rules provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party’s counsel of record. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(4). Thus, the argument regarding service is without merit.

    Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to quash is denied.

    SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of January, 2012.

    MICHAEL M. MALIHI, Judge

  41. #241
    On January 23rd, 2012 at 9:19 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    And as a follow-up to my last comment,

    ARTICLE II SUPER PAC WILL PROVIDE GAVEL TO GAVEL LIVE VIDEO COVERAGE FROM THE 3 BALLOT CHALLENGE HEARINGS IN ATLANTA, GEORGIA on JANUARY 26TH STARTING AT 9 AM ET.

  42. #242
    On January 23rd, 2012 at 10:05 am, happyscrapper said:

    On January 23rd, 2012 at 9:19 am,

    ITookTheRedPill said:
    And as a follow-up to my last comment,

    ARTICLE II SUPER PAC WILL PROVIDE GAVEL TO GAVEL LIVE VIDEO COVERAGE FROM THE 3 BALLOT CHALLENGE HEARINGS IN ATLANTA, GEORGIA on JANUARY 26TH STARTING AT 9 AM ET.

    The order will be ignored, just like other orders of the court. He just won’t show up. There is no way this egotistical monster will lower himself to answer to The People.

  43. #243
    On January 23rd, 2012 at 10:17 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    happyscrapper,
    I suspect that you are right. I will be shocked if he does show up. But if he doesn’t show up, he will be directly defying a Court order, and would essentially be challenging the Judge to find him in contempt of Court.

    The ONLY coverage I can find of this in traditional media is the Augusta Chronicle:

    http://chronicle.augusta.com/news/metro/2012-01-21/across-georgia

    Judge tells Obama to attend hearing

    ATLANTA — A judge has ordered President Obama to appear in court in Atlanta for a hearing on a complaint that says Obama isn’t a natural-born citizen and can’t be president.

    Many such lawsuits have been filed across the country without success. A Georgia resident made the complaint, which is intended to keep Obama’s name off the March primary ballot.

    An Obama campaign aide said any attempt to involve the president personally will fail and that such complaints have no merit.

    The hearing is set for Thursday. Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi on Friday denied a motion by the president’s lawyer to quash a subpoena that requires Obama to show up.

  44. #244
    On January 23rd, 2012 at 10:46 am, happyscrapper said:

    RedPill…there have been other Contempt of Court citations issued and it doesn’t seem to matter to anyone. The drilling moratorium, for example. The court orders and they ignore. They do not honor the laws of our country. And they get away with it. If our own leaders don’t respect the law, why should anyone else?

  45. #245
    On January 23rd, 2012 at 10:55 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    You’re right, happyscrapper.

    A Republic is the Rule of Law.

    Without the Rule of Law, our Republic is dead.

    I’m praying for spiritual revival in our country, and believe that that is a prerequisite to true political revival and revival of our Republic.

  46. #246
    On January 23rd, 2012 at 11:01 am, happyscrapper said:

    Hopefully God will decide we are worth saving. Perhaps if there are still more than 1/2 of the country who are trying to do the right thing, God will have mercy on us.

  47. #247
    On January 23rd, 2012 at 11:26 am, Chris in N.Va said:

    OK all you Mouseketeers, let’s all sing along now…

    When you wish upon a czar….

  48. #248
    On January 23rd, 2012 at 12:25 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On January 23rd, 2012 at 11:26 am, Chris in N.Va said:
    OK all you Mouseketeers, let’s all sing along now…

    When you wish upon a czar….

    :lol:

  49. #249
    On January 23rd, 2012 at 12:31 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:
  50. #250
    On January 23rd, 2012 at 1:18 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On January 23rd, 2012 at 12:31 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    To be totally honest, my eyes glaze over when I start to read anything legal. After the first sentence, I am struck dumb!! It just makes no sense to me. I have to trust that these lawsuits are good ones and articulated well. When things are explained in layman’s terms, I am fine. But reading actual documents? Life is too short. I will be 70 this year, the day after the election! I just want to live to see who wins!!!

  51. #251
    On January 23rd, 2012 at 1:42 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On January 23rd, 2012 at 1:18 pm, happyscrapper said:

    I just want to live to see who wins!!!

    And hopefully a few decades more…

  52. #252
    On January 23rd, 2012 at 4:50 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On January 23rd, 2012 at 1:42 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:
    On January 23rd, 2012 at 1:18 pm, happyscrapper said:

    I just want to live to see who wins!!!
    And hopefully a few decades more…

    Well, I’m pretty healthy, but I would die happy if I could just see this communist thrown out of the WH on his ass…into a giant mud puddle. And the missus right behind him. I don’t usually disrespect the POTUS, but this man is a usurper who is destroying us. He deserves no respect from me or any other Patriot.

  53. #253
    On January 23rd, 2012 at 6:15 pm, Blackstone said:

    On January 23rd, 2012 at 10:17 am, ITookTheRedPill said:
    happyscrapper,
    I suspect that you are right. I will be shocked if he does show up. But if he doesn’t show up, he will be directly defying a Court order, and would essentially be challenging the Judge to find him in contempt of Court.

    Except it apparently wouldn’t be the judge issuing the order who would hold him in contempt. According to this piece, Malihi “presides at the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings, which hears complaints against state agencies.” Since he’s an administrative judge, it’s likely his order would have to be referred to a superior court of record for the subpoena to be enforced. And they would then have the power to review its validity for themselves.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Obama’s Land of the LOST

May 25, 2012 01:42 PM by Michelle Malkin

56 Comments

Obama’s latest campaign angle: I’ve been saving America from wild Republican debts

May 24, 2012 04:33 PM by Doug Powers

55 Comments

Skinny-mirror accounting

Biden: Tea Party stopped us from growing the economy

May 23, 2012 01:55 PM by Doug Powers

44 Comments

“Imagine where we’d be…”

Jimmy Fallon: Obama ‘booked himself’ on my show

May 22, 2012 01:43 PM by Doug Powers

47 Comments

Invitation to offer invitation graciously accepted

Pose of the day

May 21, 2012 12:44 PM by Doug Powers

113 Comments

Hail Mary

Romney begins vetting running mate prospects

May 18, 2012 07:42 PM by Doug Powers

138 Comments

Plus a poll


Categories: 2012 Campaign,Democrats,Enviro-nitwits

JustOneMinute

» Barack, Youthful Leader!
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook