Jerry Brown: C’mon, California’s High Speed Rail Will Be Way Cheaper Than $100 Billion

By Doug Powers  •  January 30, 2012 10:35 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

Late last year it was reported that California’s high speed rail project wouldn’t be completed for 22 years and would end up costing about $100 billion, which is three times the initial estimate. The project received over $2 billion from the stimulus.

Gov. Jerry Brown now says the cost won’t be nearly that much, because somehow carbon fees levied on businesses (some of which would no doubt flee the state) will fund a good portion of the construction:

“It’s not going to be $100 billion,” the Democratic governor said on ABC 7′s Eyewitness Newsmakers program. “That’s way off.”

Brown’s remarks come as his administration prepares revisions to the California High-Speed Rail Authority’s latest business plan. Brown is trying to push the project through an increasingly skeptical Legislature following a series of critical reports.

“Phase 1, I’m trying to redesign it in a way that in and of itself will be justified by the state investment,” Brown said. “We do have other sources of money: For example, cap-and-trade, which is this measure where you make people who produce greenhouse gasses pay certain fees – that will be a source of funding going forward for the high speed rail.”

Brown said, “It’s going to be a lot cheaper than people are saying.”

Wait a minute. So if industry stops spewing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere right now (thereby of course saving the planet from global warming) there won’t be enough cap/trade money for the government to build the latest bankruptcy-inducing glimmer in Joe Biden’s eye? I’ve yet to hear a more convincing argument for going green.

Not unlike the government taxing tobacco and using some of the money to pay for SCHIP, the “green” movement has developed a Catch-22 dependence the very things they seek to eliminate. So keep those smokestacks spewing filth and pay those carbon fees, California industry, because Moonbeam has a “green” rail system to pay for so the planet can be saved from global warming!

At least it helps explain recent decisions like this.

I’m amazed by a bureaucratic mindset that believes forcing a portion of the price tag of a bloated project onto select areas of the private sector will lower the cost to the government, and therefore the taxpayers.

Take it away, Governor:

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On January 30th, 2012 at 10:42 pm, Mike2011 said:

    Tax and spend.
    Tax and spend.
    Tax and spend.
    Correct me if I am wrong, but California is closing prisons and letting convicts free because of budget cuts, yet Govermor Moonbeam wants to build a chooo-chooo?

  2. #2
    On January 30th, 2012 at 10:45 pm, txvet2 said:

    California is an interesting place. The self-described “conservatives” work to elect the radical leftists.

  3. #3
    On January 30th, 2012 at 10:52 pm, peteee said:

    but wait a minute, didn’t east anglia just admit there is no global warming?

    and if there is no global warming, why do we need to stop greenhouse gases?

    and if we do not cap greenhouse gases, where will the money come from now?

  4. #4
    On January 30th, 2012 at 11:10 pm, WaterBoyz said:

    ABC 7′s Eyewitness Newsmakers program.

    And the reporterette didn’t ask “Are you freaking serious?”

    This is like those WH briefings. No one there has the cajones to ask a tough question because they know they won’t get to come back.

    I also heard the Governor say “temporary taxes….”
    Has there ever been such a tax?
    Yep, class warfare is alive and well in California.

  5. #5
    On January 30th, 2012 at 11:40 pm, stuckinIL4now said:

    Whoa, this guy’s logic–or lack thereof–is so demented, he could just about qualify to run Illinois, yeah, a little farther into the earth’s crust than it already is.

  6. #6
    On January 30th, 2012 at 11:48 pm, SPCOlympics said:

    They could pay for it if they just turned highways 5 and 99 between SF and LA into toll roads. With toll booths every 10 miles. I’m sure the Gov. is looking into it.

    /sarc

  7. #7
    On January 30th, 2012 at 11:49 pm, cabrerski said:

    In California, everyone knows the price tag will exceed $100B by a lot, maybe double that. Moonbeam is counting on the Feds to bail them out.

    Making this a “green” high speed train is going to be an engineering nightmare. All those solar panels attached to the train are going to create a big wind drag…just like the wind turbine on top of each car. Maybe the unicorn feces reactor will remain stable enough, if they can find enough Dodo birds to squawk at the right frequency in the resonant cavity.

  8. #8
    On January 30th, 2012 at 11:53 pm, knucklehead said:

    For some reason this story reminds me of watching my dog go round and round chasing his tail the other day. Eventually he caught it. You could see him thinking “ok, what do I do with it now”? while he is all twisted up. He finally dropped it and then proceeded to continue his path of destruction through the house. BTW I’m pretty sure my dog is smarter than Gov. Moonbeam.

  9. #9
    On January 31st, 2012 at 6:15 am, Ralph Gizzip said:

    The only thing “Way off” is Governor Moonbeam.

  10. #10
    On January 31st, 2012 at 7:21 am, ldecker68 said:

    I work in the rail industry, high speed will probably not exist in the US in my lifetime, the environmental studies alone will take billions of dollars, hundreds of attorneys and years to complete. We have not yet crossed the “not in my backyard” or the “that tree deserves to live” lines yet.
    Existing rail lines are not technically designed to be “high speed”. So they could be used but would need to be upgraded, and the rails have invested in them to move freight which is higher paying than people.
    This is all another dream with no way to fund it except with fake money. So I am sure the politicians will try.

  11. #11
    On January 31st, 2012 at 8:09 am, Roland said:

    I really do need to get the Hell out of California.

  12. #12
    On January 31st, 2012 at 8:24 am, stillontheroad said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 8:09 am, Roland said:

    I escaped years ago and have never looked back – funnt story about Cali and their thirst for money – I was pursued for a couple years by the DMV to pay my licence fee and if I did not, would have my back account attched and possibly go to jail – you can guess what I wrote them lol

  13. #13
    On January 31st, 2012 at 8:27 am, Paratus said:

    Brown’s exact amount. “It’s going to be a lot cheaper”. Like ya know we can use the money from the tax on weed.

  14. #14
    On January 31st, 2012 at 8:33 am, Roland said:

    Brown’s exact amount. “It’s going to be a lot cheaper”.

    How is he supposed to pin down the actual cost now? If he can raise taxes enough, it’ll be free!

  15. #15
    On January 31st, 2012 at 8:44 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    “It’s not going to be $100 billion,” the Democratic governor said on ABC 7′s Eyewitness Newsmakers program. “That’s way off.”

    True. It will probably be many times that amount. Medicare was supposed to be costing $12 Billion 20 years after it started. It was closer to 10 times that amount.

    Government Math: NEVER carry the one.

  16. #16
    On January 31st, 2012 at 8:48 am, mondamay said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 8:09 am, Roland said:

    I really do need to get the Hell out of California.

    Or as Satan would say:

    I need to get the California out of Hell.

    Ba-dump-ba, chish!

    Tip your waitresses!

  17. #17
    On January 31st, 2012 at 8:49 am, Roland said:

    – I was pursued for a couple years by the DMV to pay my licence fee and if I did not, would have my back account attched and possibly go to jail –

    Thanks for the heads up. When I leave, I’ll make the break as clean and clear as possible. Cash out, and cash out.

    Sacramento will love me for the one time capital gains, but this golden goose will be gone for good.

  18. #18
    On January 31st, 2012 at 8:57 am, RedDog said:

    Dude, money’s not a problem. That’s what taxes and printing presses are for.

    What good is a high speed rail system when there will be no ridership? In 20 years California will be a gigantic Thunderdome.

  19. #19
    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:01 am, RedDog said:

    Government would be more tolerable if it were run by chimpanzees. Low overhead and no golden pension plans.

  20. #20
    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:08 am, mondamay said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 8:57 am, RedDog said:

    California will be a gigantic Thunderdome.

    You mean two men enter, one man leaves?

  21. #21
    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:10 am, RedDog said:

    Is this how civilizations end, with grandiose and pointless schemes? We won’t need to worry about asking the last person in California to turn off the lights. The power grid will be long gone before everyone can get out.

  22. #22
    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:11 am, RedDog said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:08 am, mondamay said:
    … You mean two men enter, one man leaves?

    Three if you count Master Blaster.

  23. #23
    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:23 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    “To get back to the warning that I received. You may take it with however many grains of salt that you wish. That the brown acid that is circulating around us isn’t too good. It is suggested that you stay away from that. Of course it’s your own trip. So be my guest, but please be advised that there is a warning on that one, ok?”

    Apparently Jerry Brown did not heed that warning.

  24. #24
    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:24 am, Flyoverman said:

    The stupidity is absolutely stunning.

  25. #25
    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:26 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Basil Fawlty: You’ll have to forgive him. He’s from Barcelona.

  26. #26
    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:26 am, mondamay said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:11 am, RedDog said:

    I preferred Lord Humungus.

    He kept order and had a sound energy policy.

    The Humungus: There has been too much violence. Too much pain. But I have an honorable compromise. Just walk away. Give me your pump, the oil, the gasoline, and the whole compound, and I’ll spare your lives. Just walk away and we’ll give you a safe passageway in the wastelands. Just walk away and there will be an end to the horror.

    I await your answer. You have a full day to decide.

  27. #27
    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:29 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Basil Fawlty: [to Jerry] Stupidissimo! Continental cretin!

  28. #28
    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:34 am, Paratus said:

    Give us your tired and poor and those yearning to ride a high speed rail.

  29. #29
    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:39 am, prendad said:

    The project received over $2 billion from the stimulus.

    I wonder how many free lunches, vacations, tanks of gas, hotel rooms, lavish dinners,bar tabs, and bribes this money has paid for?

  30. #30
    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:45 am, RocketDan said:

    Brown said, “It’s going to be a lot cheaper than people are saying.”

    No, even he is not saying it will cost less. He is just saying they will find backdoor ways to get Californians (and probably everyone else) to pay the huge bill so it won’t seem that the bill is so high. But the cap-and-trade fees will be passed on to consumers so they will pay the whole ticket one way or the other. CA still relies on slight of hand when they need simple 8th grade math skills.

  31. #31
    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:53 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    On January 30th, 2012 at 10:45 pm, txvet2 said:

    California is an interesting place. The self-described “conservatives” work to elect the radical leftists.

    While Texans send their leftist garbage to the White House as they are giving their state away to Mexico. Wake up, dude. The only place your Texas exists is in your head. You need to get out more.

  32. #32
    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:01 am, Flyoverman said:

    I preferred Lord Humungus.

    He kept order and had a sound energy policy.

    And appropriately he was the Ruler of the Wasteland, which is what all tyrants ultimately end up giving the people they rule.

  33. #33
    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:07 am, Misscheryl said:

    We’ll all be better off when California slips into the ocean. If that doesn’t happen, I’m all about seceding from the Not United States of America. Maybe then we won’t have to hear about the kookiness that goes on there on a daily basis and effects the rest of the nation.

  34. #34
    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:09 am, Truesoldier said:

    On January 30th, 2012 at 11:10 pm, WaterBoyz said:

    I also heard the Governor say “temporary taxes….”
    Has there ever been such a tax?

    He was telling the truth. The taxes are temporary…..the level of the tax will be temporary until they raise it higher and higher.

  35. #35
    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:11 am, Truesoldier said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 8:24 am, stillontheroad said:
    On January 31st, 2012 at 8:09 am, Roland said:

    I escaped years ago and have never looked back – funnt story about Cali and their thirst for money – I was pursued for a couple years by the DMV to pay my licence fee and if I did not, would have my back account attched and possibly go to jail.

    Same thing happened to me when I left in the 90′s. They also continued to send me jury duty notices. When I called them about it they told me that I would have to come back to California to prove that I had left California. And no I am not kidding.

  36. #36
    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:12 am, J S Ragman said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 8:57 am, RedDog said:

    What good is a high speed rail system when there will be no ridership?

    C’mon man. The illegals have to have some way to get to the sanctuary cities.

  37. #37
    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:17 am, dan708 said:

    Gov Moonbeam is off his meds again, eh? Since when has ANY government project gotten done on time and under budget?

  38. #38
    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:20 am, Roland said:

    The illegals have to have some way to get to the sanctuary cities.

    Stopping undocumented Americans from getting to sanctuary cities is racist.

  39. #39
    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:27 am, Truesoldier said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:12 am, J S Ragman said:
    C’mon man. The illegals have to have some way to get to the sanctuary cities

    I would not be suprised to find out that there was an express train slotted to run from Tijuana to SF every few hours.

  40. #40
    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:28 am, nail49 said:

    The actual cost of any gubmint project can be arrived at by a simple formula. Take the highest projected cost, square it and then multiply by pi.

  41. #41
    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:36 am, happyscrapper said:

    I can understand the need for a light rail system out there. The traffic jams are unbelievable. It is one giant parking lot. They do have a problem. And, light rail going into the major cities, picking up people from the outlying suburbs and building “park and ride” stations is a beautiful thing. We have that here in Minneapolis and it is very very nice!

    Believe it or not, Jesse Ventura got that ball rolling! I don’t know if the light rail will eventually fail, but for now, it is wonderful. I have used it a lot…it takes you right downtown to the Dome and other stuff.

    Having said that…if you are bankrupt, you shouldn’t make plans to spend billions of dollars. That kind of logic continues to elude the regressives in California and DC.

    As for the suggestion that California secede from the Union. That will never work. We would need a huge electrifed fence, a moat and alligators around the entire state to keep the inmates from escaping into the SANE states. And believe me, they would be trying desperately to get out!!

  42. #42
    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:44 am, Truesoldier said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:36 am, happyscrapper said:
    I can understand the need for a light rail system out there. The traffic jams are unbelievable. It is one giant parking lot. They do have a problem. And, light rail going into the major cities, picking up people from the outlying suburbs and building “park and ride” stations is a beautiful thing. We have that here in Minneapolis and it is very very nice!

    I know San Jose has light rail, but that did not really alleviate the problem as much as some might think it would. Part of the problem is the same problem you see in so many liberal states. When they build roads they do not build all purpose lanes they add new HOV (carpool lanes). This is great for people who carpool, but doesn’t help everyone out.

    In parts of WA ST the HOV lanes are HOV lanes 24/7 365 and when I was in Napa last September I noticed that the HOV lanes around the Bay Bridge required a minimum of 3 people to use them.

    Another problem in the San Jose are for traffic is road design. I remeber a stretch of 101 south bound that went from 4 southbound lanes to 2 southbound lanes in a half mile stretch. You can only imagine how bad the back up would get there.

  43. #43
    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:47 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Whoda thunk that having sex with Linda Ronstadt would be so draining of precious brain fluids.

  44. #44
    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:50 am, Truesoldier said:

    Also, light rail only works if it is desigend right. In OR I used to take the MAX from Gresham to downtown everyday. After the first couple of stops that train would be standing room only.

    In WA ST they designed the light rail poorly. They only had one park and ride lot on the entire stretch when it opened (not sure if they have added any since) and street parking near the light rail stops were changed to a max of either 2 or 4 hours. So the light rail lacked any real ridership.

    Here is what the spokesman for SDOT said:

    “Light rail was meant to be fed by people taking the bus, walking or biking,” said Rick Sheridan, spokesman for the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT). “It was not meant to be fed by cars.”

  45. #45
    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:57 am, Wade said:

    Sure it will be less. Just ask about the big dig in Massachusetts.

  46. #46
    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:57 am, jsmiddleton4 said:
  47. #47
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:10 am, Flyoverman said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:36 am, happyscrapper said:

    I can understand the need for a light rail system out there.

    Then CA should be able to FULLY fund it.

  48. #48
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:15 am, Flyoverman said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:47 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Whoda thunk that having sex with Linda Ronstadt would be so draining of precious brain fluids.

    I-I first became aware of it, Mandrake, during the physical act of love…Yes, a profound sense of fatigue, a feeling of emptiness followed. Luckily I-I was able to interpret these feelings correctly. Loss of essence. I can assure you it has not recurred, Mandrake. Women, er, women sense my power, and they seek the life essence. I do not avoid women, Mandrake. But I do deny them my essence.

  49. #49
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:18 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    So isn’t this Phil’s state?

  50. #50
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:20 am, SHoward said:

    Southern CA has light rail. But it never seems to be convenient to where I live or need to go. Gee. Go figure.

    BTW, according to this, CA and TX have the same concentration of hispanics. And if I’m not mistaken, the largest urban population of Latinos in the world outside of Mexico City is Los Angeles. I guess that could be wrong, but East L.A. is 97% hispanic. (Just throwing some gas on a fire.;)

  51. #51
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:21 am, mondamay said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:15 am, Flyoverman said:

    And don’t get me started on fluoridation!

  52. #52
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:21 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:57 am, Wade said:
    Sure it will be less. Just ask about the big dig in Massachusetts.

    Which solved absolutely nothing for the commute from either North or South, by the way.

  53. #53
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:24 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    The steamboats were the first engine powered transport vehicles. Big improvement over mule drawn barges and sailboats. Canals were dug to provide more access than rivers and coasts could. Most areas couldn’t be served by these systems.
    ***
    Then the railroads opened up most of the country to easier travel. But not all areas could be served due to high costs of construction and operation.
    ***
    Then buses, cars, and airplanes provided far better transportation to all areas. The time of trains and steamboats ended long ago. Except for subway and rail systems in densely packed corridors where they can compete at a profit and provide real benefits.
    ***
    Governor MoonBeam is really unbalanced. Wasting 200 Billion (1 Trillion?) dollars of taxpayer money on a system that will have to be subsidized forever to “compete” is truly stupid. The marijuana smoke in Kali must have destroyed the ability to think long ago.
    ***
    Politicians think that the laws of science and economics can be repealed by government. If they repealed the Law of Gravity these clueless and corrupt clowns would expect to see the furniture floating up in the air!
    ***
    But the real goal is using any crisis or problem to enable them to “mine” the taxpayers pockets for money for themselves and their corrupt buddies. And Kali will probably be able to tap into the rest of the states pockets to “fund” their dreams.
    ***
    If high speed trains made sense and were profitable without subsidies they would have been built long ago. By the free market capitalists–not by the government. Without taxpayer bucks.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  54. #54
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:25 am, Truesoldier said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:21 am, Rogue Cheddar said:
    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:57 am, Wade said:
    Sure it will be less. Just ask about the big dig in Massachusetts.
    Which solved absolutely nothing for the commute from either North or South, by the way.

    And now Seattle wants to do the same with the Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement tunnel. At least the voters here in WA ST have drawn the line and have told Seattle if you want the tunnel then you fund.

  55. #55
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:26 am, Flyoverman said:

    And don’t get me started on fluoridation!

    Feed me, Mandrake, feed me…… ;)

  56. #56
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:29 am, hawkeye54 said:

    If high speed trains made sense and were profitable without subsidies they would have been built long ago. By the free market capitalists–not by the government. Without taxpayer bucks.

    Absolutely. Keep taxpayer bucks out of it entirely. Something that can be said of far too many government financed follies.

  57. #57
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:29 am, AlohaGuy said:

    What happened to change Gov. Brown’s mind and cause him to fire the head of the California Department of Conservation who wrote that easing restrictions would violate environmental laws? A deep recession and an 11.1% unemployment rate.

    Drill Steampunk, Drill.

  58. #58
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:30 am, Cameron said:

    OK, stillontheroad. I want to hear the whole story about the California DMV.

    Personally, my break with them was a lot cleaner. Never heard from them after I left.

  59. #59
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:32 am, Truesoldier said:

    Speaking of rail transportation on the west coast, has anyone seen the cost of a regular coach ticket from LA to SF?

    I looked it up. It is $114 round trip on Amtrak and will take about 9 hours. I checked the airlines and they are $138 round trip and will take you 1 hour and 15 minutes.

  60. #60
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:32 am, Haven said:

    you know, I was having a discussion with a friend the other day about how people rarely change before they’ve hit rock bottom.

    Problem with our government is, once you’ve hit rock bottom, you print more money and keep digging till you hit China.

    I’ve been looking for a job for the last three months. My hand is cramped from so many applications, I have walked into dozens upon dozens of businesses, and spent hours online looking for a job. So I’m a little incensed and trying to make sense of this. So here’s my attempt at understanding things.

    This wonderful state of mine wants to make things as hard as possible for businesses to operate, by imposing additional taxes and tariffs on them, so that they can make more money, which comes from the taxes those businesses pay, to fund their projects which are supposed to save our state from a troubled economy, which we’re suffering from because of severe debt, which comes from spending money on ridiculous projects in the first place, instead using the hypothetical money that comes from crushing businesses to pay off the state debt.

    Do I just about have that right? Because if I do, I don’t have any clue what I’m talking about.

  61. #61
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:32 am, hawkeye54 said:

    Politicians think that the laws of science and economics can be repealed by government.

    No. The politician simply ignore economics and science for the benefit of their own political power and ability to divert trainloads of taxpayer money to their cronies be it family, friends, unions, and corporations.

  62. #62
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:37 am, hawkeye54 said:

    Speaking of rail transportation on the west coast, has anyone seen the cost of a regular coach ticket from LA to SF?

    Actually to the statist elites, air and private vehicle travel should only be reserved for their social and economic class.

    Don’t you see, rail travel is for the hordes of the commoners to be forced to suffer in using. Fixed Rail Public transportation makes it easier for manipulation and control of public travel – when, where and how frequently.

  63. #63
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:37 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:28 am, nail49 said:

    The actual cost of any gubmint project can be arrived at by a simple formula. Take the highest projected cost, square it and then multiply by pi.

    You forgot the last step: then move the decimal point one space to the right.

  64. #64
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:43 am, MaverickThrowback said:

    Mike2011 said:
    California is closing prisons and letting convicts free because of budget cuts, yet Govermor Moonbeam wants to build a chooo-chooo?

    perfect GIVEN transport for these preemy releasies.

  65. #65
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:45 am, Truesoldier said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:37 am, hawkeye54 said:
    Don’t you see, rail travel is for the hordes of the commoners to be forced to suffer in using. Fixed Rail Public transportation makes it easier for manipulation and control of public travel – when, where and how frequently.

    Not to mention the nostalgic feelings of the old USSR that it stirs in liberals.

  66. #66
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:45 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    And now Seattle wants to do the same with the Alaskan Way Viaduct

    Chico: Vy a duck?! Vy not a chicken? Vy not a horse?

  67. #67
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:48 am, thejim said:

    While it’s true that California is getting what they voted for (insanity & moronic politicians), it’s also true that there are a lot of Conservative Californians without a voice in any of it.

  68. #68
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:54 am, hawkeye54 said:

    Not to mention the nostalgic feelings of the old USSR that it stirs in liberals.

    Yes indeed. They continually dream and conspire and plan for its revival right here in their very own USSSA – United Soviet Socialist States of Amerika.

  69. #69
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:55 am, RedDog said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 10:47 am, Rogue Cheddar said:
    Whoda thunk that having sex with Linda Ronstadt would be so draining of precious brain fluids.

    Have you actually seen her? eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee….. Guaranteed dessication.

  70. #70
    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:56 am, SHoward said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:48 am, thejim said:

    Now that is a very reasonable way of putting it. However, two things must be noted:

    1. There are more actual liberals here than conservatives.

    2. The “conservative” I have met here aren’t usually quite as conservative as they think they are. They would rate themselves very conservative, but compared to outside CA, they’re sort of centrist.

    (More gas for a fire that sparked….)

    NOTE: Yes, there are some dyed-in-the-wool conservatives and libertarians here, but they are quite small in number.

  71. #71
    On January 31st, 2012 at 12:08 pm, txvet2 said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:53 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    Ding, ding. The bell rings, the dog salivates.

  72. #72
    On January 31st, 2012 at 12:19 pm, Cameron said:

    Speaking of rail transportation on the west coast, has anyone seen the cost of a regular coach ticket from LA to SF?

    The only advantages would be no TSA groping and it’s somewhat more comfortable than driving.

  73. #73
    On January 31st, 2012 at 12:19 pm, SHoward said:

    On January 30th, 2012 at 11:10 pm, WaterBoyz said:

    Actually, there was a temporary tax increase here in CA that recently ended. That’s one of the things that upset the socialists… I mean Liberals. It can happen, and indeed, this fall will be an interesting election where the peeps of CA will be asked to vote for more tax increases. I doubt they will, because even the libs and centrists see their wallets shrinking.

    BTW, I photographed Moonbeam once at an event in L.A., and he really is quite animated in person. Too bad he’s such a dweeb.

  74. #74
    On January 31st, 2012 at 12:25 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On January 31, 2012 at 07:26 am, mondamay said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 9:11 am, RedDog said:

    I preferred Lord Humungus.

    He kept order and had a sound energy policy.

    The Humungus: There has been too much violence. Too much pain. But I have an honorable compromise. Just walk away. Give me your pump, the oil, the gasoline, and the whole compound, and I’ll spare your lives. Just walk away and we’ll give you a safe passageway in the wastelands. Just walk away and there will be an end to the horror.

    I await your answer. You have a full day to decide.

    I was just thinking about Humungus last night…how alGore is Humungus, and all those sycophants pushing his myth were like the Toadie who introduced Humungus.

    The ayatollah of shinola.

  75. #75
    On January 31st, 2012 at 12:26 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    BTW, I photographed Moonbeam once at an event in L.A., and he really is quite animated in person.

    You mean, like a cartoon?

  76. #76
    On January 31st, 2012 at 12:31 pm, SHoward said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 12:26 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Ha! Well, his words sounded a little slurred and lispy and he kept saying something about a rascally rabbit, I think, but at least physically he was quite real. He resolved on my camera sensors, anyway.

    But I’m not kidding, I couldn’t kill the shine on his head! I had to get creative angles while he was speaking or I was blinded! Again, I’m not kidding! (It was an outside engagement at a non-profit while he was AG.)

  77. #77
    On January 31st, 2012 at 12:31 pm, J S Ragman said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 11:45 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Chico: Vy a duck?! Vy not a chicken? Vy not a horse?

    Well played, sir.

  78. #78
    On January 31st, 2012 at 12:33 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On January 31, 2012 at 08:36 am, happyscrapper said:

    I can understand the need for a light rail system out there. The traffic jams are unbelievable. It is one giant parking lot. They do have a problem. And, light rail going into the major cities, picking up people from the outlying suburbs and building “park and ride” stations is a beautiful thing. We have that here in Minneapolis and it is very very nice!

    Believe it or not, Jesse Ventura got that ball rolling! I don’t know if the light rail will eventually fail, but for now, it is wonderful. I have used it a lot…it takes you right downtown to the Dome and other stuff.

    Perhaps someone has pointed this out, but, from what I recall, the Cali choo-choo will not go near many cities to make it worth riding.

    Similar to other light rail liberal wet dreams around the country ….not going anywhere useful.

  79. #79
    On January 31st, 2012 at 12:39 pm, Mister P said:

    I’ve seen this in Arizona, as the politicians and they cronies get to buy the land in the path of the freeways, then make huge profits when the state pays for the land. Remember all boon-doggles are meant for two purposes only: money and power.

  80. #80
    On January 31st, 2012 at 12:42 pm, Mister P said:

    The traffic jams are unbelievable.

    Urban planning is much to blame. The planners love to build a wheel plan with a center and spokes rather than a grid system. It funnels traffic into the densest areas. Since California also went to high density over urban sprawl (which environmentalists hate), land prices in the cities being limited soared, hence the housing price bubble that put us in a recession. Don’t expect California to learn a damn thing.

  81. #81
    On January 31st, 2012 at 12:45 pm, Mister P said:

    I looked it up. It is $114 round trip on Amtrak and will take about 9 hours. I checked the airlines and they are $138 round trip and will take you 1 hour and 15 minutes.

    I can fly from Bend Oregon to Oakland for about 50 dollars and it takes a little over an hour.

  82. #82
    On January 31st, 2012 at 12:47 pm, J S Ragman said:

    About 25 years ago, I was considering going to the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, to get my masters degree. One of the options for military housing was to avoid the wait, and take a house down the coast at the Naval Facility in Big Sur. My friends advised against that option, as rockslides would frequently close the highway, and one would either be stuck in town or at home. I’m glad they’ve solved that problem. I’d hate to hit a boulder in a train going 120 MPH.

  83. #83
    On January 31st, 2012 at 1:10 pm, Southpaw said:

    Flying out of Ontario or Palm Springs Airport, I would be in Oakland before a high speed train even reached Bakersfield.

    Jerry Brown is a freakin’ moron.

  84. #84
    On January 31st, 2012 at 1:12 pm, DanMan said:

    Every time the conversation gets heated to build the Texas Triangle, a train between Houston, Dallas and San Antonio, SW Airlines drops their ticket prices to $59 one way anywhere in Texas and screws the economics they try to justify it with.

    I also know it is just about exactly the same distance between Houston and Dallas whether you go I-45 or I-35/Hwy 6/US290. I just ran that circle and I think SW Airlines also pays TxDOT to keep at least one project on each to bottle up both routes.

  85. #85
    On January 31st, 2012 at 1:13 pm, Truesoldier said:

    O/T…Rush is talking about this right now:

    Politico’s Jonathan Martin Mocks Conservative Florida Voters as the ‘Cracker Counties’

  86. #86
    On January 31st, 2012 at 1:28 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, He’s probably right because they will price out all the work and bridges with union wages and rules and decide the chinese can do it for less with chinese steel just like the Guvinator did.

  87. #87
    On January 31st, 2012 at 1:28 pm, Paratus said:

    “Cracker Counties”, keeping with the civility theme.

  88. #88
    On January 31st, 2012 at 1:31 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “I can fly from Bend Oregon to Oakland”

    Yes but if you take the train your arms won’t be so tired when you arrive.

  89. #89
    On January 31st, 2012 at 1:32 pm, rambler said:

    I vote for California to be free from the constraints of being a state. It needs to be a free and independent country so that all the loopy ideas its citizens want won’t be paid for by the rest of us and Princess Nan can be speaker again without imposing her will on the rest of the country.

  90. #90
    On January 31st, 2012 at 1:33 pm, ChapBix said:

    More convoluted thinking by the prog left.

  91. #91
    On January 31st, 2012 at 1:34 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    I dare say the whole mass transit, rapid train thing, huddled masses controlled by an elite group of folks is the left. They don’t need to justify it economically in anyway as their world view takes care of that for them.

    We the huddled masses need them to tell us how to move about and what business we’ll be doing in that moving about.

    So if you think you can talk a Jerry Brown out of rapid train or any other mass transit by using facts and figures you are crazy just as he is.

    The only way to prevent this stuff from ever happening is to keep folks like Jerry Brown out of power.

  92. #92
    On January 31st, 2012 at 1:36 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    Politico’s Jonathan Martin Mocks Conservative Florida Voters as the ‘Cracker Counties’

    Well if anyone actually watched the show you’d have more folks complaining.

  93. #93
    On January 31st, 2012 at 1:39 pm, tomg51 said:

    The project will be halted, once they discover an endangered newt in the way….

  94. #94
    On January 31st, 2012 at 1:40 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    The other aspect of the rapid transit thing is its a focus changer. Get people to stop focusing on what is and get them focusing on what isn’t.

    Can’t keep people focused on what is in California as what actually is, well it sucks.

    Still gets me to smiling how Pasadena Phil is so busy lambasting all of us in other states about every issue under the sun as IF in his state he has made some kind of positive impact with is perpetual grumpiness.

  95. #95
    On January 31st, 2012 at 1:44 pm, Southpaw said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 1:32 pm, rambler said:

    I vote for California to be free from the constraints of being a state. It needs to be a free and independent country so that all the loopy ideas its citizens want won’t be paid for by the rest of us and Princess Nan can be speaker again without imposing her will on the rest of the country.

    I propose California being split into two states:

    Old California consisting of Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Hayward, Alameda, Contra Costa and Sacramento Counties.

    New California consisting of everything else.

    New California would be a great state if it dumped Los Angeles, San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose, Berkeley and Sacramento.

    http://www.digital-topo-maps.com/county-map/california-county-map.gif

  96. #96
    On January 31st, 2012 at 2:04 pm, Regulus said:

    “Jerry Brown eats quiche on Spaceship Earth.”

    – from the book, Real Men Don’t Eat Quiche, published in 1982

    At least he’s consistent. He’s just as whacked out now as he was 30 years ago.

    On January 31st, 2012 at 8:09 am, Roland said:

    I really do need to get the Hell out of California.

    What a damn shame California has become. Back in the 1980s, I would’ve lied, cheated, stolen, killed to get to live in the Golden State; maybe a couple of stints at the Presidio of Monterey spoiled me.

    But now… it just tears the heart out to see what it’s become: Mexifornia.

    Just a damn, damn shame.

  97. #97
    On January 31st, 2012 at 2:05 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    I think they’ll have plenty of riders– once people stop buying cars because the mandated electric car quota kicks in. Unless they start giving away a Volt with every SUV or pickup purchased.

  98. #98
    On January 31st, 2012 at 2:23 pm, SHoward said:

    I propose California being split into two states:

    Old California consisting of Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Hayward, Alameda, Contra Costa and Sacramento Counties.

    New California consisting of everything else.

    You’re probably aware that there is a proposal something like that being advanced by someone in Riverside county. He’s revived the idea of a North California and a South California with a twist: LA county would be carved out of South California and left with the North. That way we won’t have too many liberals or a Governor Villaragosa.

    Hmm. Come to think of it, Pasadena is in the liberal LA county.

  99. #99
    On January 31st, 2012 at 2:37 pm, Hangfire said:

    On January 31st, 2012 at 8:09 am, Roland said:

    I really do need to get the Hell out of California.

    Forget Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii.

    They are CaliforniaLite

    May I recommend Oklahoma or Texas?

  100. #100
    On January 31st, 2012 at 2:56 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:
    On January 31st, 2012 at 12:45 pm, Mister P said:
    I can fly from Bend Oregon to Oakland for about 50 dollars and it takes a little over an hour.

    Plus that’s not even discounting all the money you’ll save with all the TSA groping you get instead of fequenting the cathouse. Or so I’ve heard. :roll:

You must be logged in to post a comment.


JustOneMinute

» Barack, Youthful Leader!
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook