File under: “How to fake a walkback.”
With its unconstitutional, coercive, discriminatory Obamacare abortion mandate under fire, the White House announced…nothing today. A supposed “accommodation” to the policy will result in no compromise in the impact of the HHS edict forcing religiously affiliated health care providers and employers to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives, abortifacients, and related services that violate the religious principles and freedom of the mandate’s targets.
In fact, close observers say today’s announcement will make things worse.
With the White House under fire for its new rule requiring employers including religious organizations to offer health insurance that fully covers birth control coverage, ABC News has learned that later today the White House — possibly President Obama himself — will likely announce an attempt to accommodate these religious groups. The move, based on state models, will almost certainly not satisfy bishops and other religious leaders since it will preserve the goal of women employees having their birth control fully covered by health insurance.
Sources say it will be respectful of religious beliefs but will not back off from that goal, which many religious leaders oppose since birth control is in violation of their religious beliefs.
White House officials are likening it to the so-called Hawaii compromise.
Phony baloney, say Catholic bishops:
It’s difficult to know what people may mean by the “Hawaii compromise.” But a central feature of the Hawaii law is that every religious organization that is eligible for the exemption has to instruct all employees in how they can access all methods of contraception and sterilization locally “in an expeditious manner.”
Just a few days ago the White House was saying that this is just about coverage, that no one has to be involved in getting people to the actual services they object to. It would be no improvement to say: “Sure, you don’t have to include the coverage, you just have to send all your lay employees and women religious to the local Planned Parenthood clinic.” The Administration’s press release of January 20 hinted at such a requirement.
That would not be a compromise. In some ways it would be worse.
As usual, this defiant administration keeps digging itself deeper.
The Hill calls Obama’s announcement a “retreat.”
The White House will announce a retreat from its controversial rule requiring religious organizations like charities and hospitals to include contraception in their healthcare plans.
President Obama has come under heavy criticism from the Catholic Church and other religious organizations, Republicans and even some Democrats over the issue, and Vice President Biden has suggested a compromise could be worked out.
A White House official on Friday confirmed an announcement on changing the rule would be made Friday. The White House is referring to the change as an accommodation.
It’s not a retreat. It’s a re-trick.
It’s not an accommodation. It’s an abomination.
Update 11am Weekly Standard reporter John McCormak is on a conference call with White House officials providing background on the policy head fake.
Sr. admin off.: “the insurance company, not the hospital, not the charity will be required to reach out” to women to provide contraception
So religious groups will still be mandated to offer plans that cover contraception, and the abortion drug ella.
Reporter asks if WH even consulted bishops before announcing ‘accommodation.’ Sr admin official won’t say.
To clarify, religious groups have to contract with INSURERS who do offer the pills, then the insurers offers free pills to women.
Update 12:26pm EST – From his brief press conference, Obama attacks “cynical” opponents of abortion mandate. He says “principle” of “access to free preventative care including contraceptive services” will stand.
“Religious liberty will be protected.” Translation: You’re still screwed.
Update: On Fox News, Kathleen The Shredder Sebelius attempts to defend the policy as a “no-cost strategy” by citing “actuaries” who claim that contraceptive coverage will actually “save money.”
She repeatedly invokes “women’s health” to defend the edict.
Sanger’s grim reapers have the rhetoric down pat.
More from Steven Ertelt at Life News: Pro-Life Advocates Blast Revised Obama Pro-Abortion Mandate:
blog comments powered by Disqus
Jonathan Imbody, Vice President for Government Relations for the Christian Medical Association, called the revisions “offering a distinction without a difference to mute opposition.”
He said the revision fits a pattern of contempt for conscience that includes how Obama “has gutted the only federal regulation protecting the exercise of conscience in health care, denied of federal grant funds for aiding human trafficking victims because a faith-based organization refused to participate in abortion; lobbied the Supreme Court to restrict faith-based organizations’ hiring rights; and issued a coercive contraceptive mandate that imposes the government’s abortion ideology on every American.”
November 27, 2013 09:44 AM by Michelle Malkin
July 11, 2013 01:47 PM by Doug Powers
July 7, 2013 02:40 PM by Doug Powers
January 16, 2013 09:26 AM by Michelle Malkin
May 29, 2013 09:06 AM by Michelle Malkin