For Liljenquist, Mourdock, and Cruz: A Tea Party Senate takeover
For Liljenquist, Mourdock, and Cruz: A Tea Party Senate takeover
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2012
The tea party isn’t dead. It’s just looking down ballot. While fiscal conservatives remain split over the GOP presidential candidates, grassroots activists are coalescing around a stellar slate of limited-government candidates looking to reinforce and reenergize the right in Washington.
And in the spirit of the modern-day tea party movement, no entrenched incumbent — Democrat or Republican — is safe.
Utah was Ground Zero for the movement’s first major electoral upset. In April 2009, this column first reported on a Salt Lake City tea party protest of 2,000 Utahans who repeatedly booed GOP Sens. Bob Bennett and Orrin Hatch for supporting the $700 billion TARP bank bailout. In May 2010, the three-term, 76-year-old Bennett got the boot at the GOP state convention. Young conservative lawyer Mike Lee, who clerked for Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, went on to win the seat.
Now, young conservative entrepreneur and renowned state pension reformer Dan Liljenquist is taking on Utah’s other big government Republican barnacle, 77-year-old Hatch. Liljenquist excelled in the private sector as a global management consultant and business strategist; he also helmed a privately owned call center company that grew from two to 1,500 employees since its 1995 founding. Liljenquist was elected to the Utah Senate in 2008, where he spearheaded state pension and Medicaid reforms that earned him the non-partisan Governing magazine’s 2011 “Public Official of the Year” award.
The 36-year, six-term Hatch was first elected in 1976 on an anti-entrenched incumbent platform. Hatch’s campaign line then against his opponent Frank Moss: “What do you call a Senator who’s served in office for 18 years? You call him home.” Now, Hatch is clinging to power after almost four decades in government — and vainly attempting to claim the tea party mantle to stave off Liljenquist’s David vs. Goliath primary challenge.
Hatch co-sponsored the $6 billion national service boondoggle and dedicated it to his good friend Teddy Kennedy, with whom he also joined hands to create the ever-expanding SCHIP health care entitlement. He slobbered over corruptocrat Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd, supported tax cheat Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner from Day One, lavished praise on Joe Biden’s manhood, and embraced and defended Attorney General Eric Holder’s nomination because, he said, “I like Barack Obama, and I want to help him if I can.”
In Indiana, another aging liberal Republican dinosaur is fighting for his political life by masquerading as a tea party standard-bearer. The six-term 79-year-old Sen. Dick Lugar — who prides himself on being Obama’s favorite Republican — hasn’t lived in his home state since 1977. He supported the Obama stimulus law, job-killing environmental mandates and the taxpayer bailouts of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as the auto and banking industry bailouts.
Richard Mourdock, Indiana’s former state treasurer, offers a fresh alternative with widespread support from both grassroots activists and local and state GOP officials. While others hedged their bets, Mourdock took the federal auto bailout head on, lodging a court complaint against the Chrysler bailout to expose its illegal abuse of shareholders and punitive impact on Indiana citizens. He was elected to the treasurer’s office in 2006, a tough year for Republicans, and was re-elected handily in 2010. Before politics, he worked in the private sector for 30 years managing businesses in the energy, environmental and construction industries. He’s never had a Beltway zip code.
In Texas, young attorney Ted Cruz is making waves in the GOP race to replace retiring GOP Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison. The former Texas solicitor general is a 10th Amendment scholar who doesn’t just speak the tea party’s language. Cruz has put constitutional conservatism into action, winning many of the 40 cases he has argued in front of the Supreme Court. Cruz isn’t afraid to challenge the GOP establishment. In 2008, he successfully battled the Bush administration and meddling globalists all the way to the high court to prevent international law from superseding American sovereignty.
The GOP needs just four seats to take control of the Senate. With inspired and inspiring free-market candidates like Dan Liljenquist, Richard Mourdock and Ted Cruz, 2012 bodes well for the tea party footprint on Capitol Hill. Remember: Entrenched incumbency is the disease. Fresh blood is the cure.
***
FreedomWorks supports Cruz and Mourdock.
FreedomWorks honors Liljenquist as “Legislative Entrepreneur of the Year Award”
Club for Growth backs Mourdock.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
GOP Texas primary fight: Desperate Dewhurst slimes conservative challenger Ted Cruz
May 25, 2012 07:31 PM by Michelle Malkin
8 CommentsWho’s funding Brett Kimberlin?
May 25, 2012 01:52 PM by Michelle Malkin
28 CommentsObama’s Land of the LOST
May 25, 2012 01:42 PM by Michelle Malkin
54 CommentsObama’s latest campaign angle: I’ve been saving America from wild Republican debts
May 24, 2012 04:33 PM by Doug Powers
55 CommentsSenate finally passes a budget approves bill striking word ‘lunatic’ from federal law
May 24, 2012 11:22 AM by Doug Powers
193 CommentsStammertime: Jay Carney asked if Chicago protests have soured Obama’s support for OWS
May 23, 2012 07:44 PM by Doug Powers
54 CommentsS.E. Cupp, Hustler, and the four stages of conservative female abuse
May 23, 2012 02:13 PM by Michelle Malkin
142 CommentsBiden: Tea Party stopped us from growing the economy
May 23, 2012 01:55 PM by Doug Powers
44 CommentsPig Maher’s boy Bill Burton mocks my support of Hatch challenger Dan Liljenquist
May 23, 2012 11:37 AM by Michelle Malkin
32 Comments
Categories: 2012 Campaign,GOP,Politics,Tea Party



JustOneMinute
» Patterico And The Brett Kimberlin Gang
Babalu Blog
» U.S. Manned Space Flight in The 21st Century
Villainous Company
» Must Read Post of the Day. Possibly, the Year











I know you all are going to go nuts, but how about a Santorum/Condoleeza Rice ticket? She has the executive experience as Secretary of State. She may bring more “gravitas” to the ticket than Bachmann, who I’d also like as VP.
Of course, Santorum/Romney would be OK, except for Mitt’s negative ads which would be used against Santorum by Obama.
I found this interesting so I posted it in another blog:
In 2008, ISI tested 2,508 adults of all ages and educational backgrounds, and once again the results were discouraging. Seventy-one percent of Americans failed the exam, with high school graduates scoring 44% and college graduates also failing at 57%.
College-educated adults were particularly ignorant of the Founding and Civil War eras, constitutional themes, and the essential features of a market economy.
gmatt2003:
Santorum/Rubio 2012
Santorum/Malkin 2012
Either one works for me.
Another survey of college students in Lynchburg, VA area in 2007 found that only 37% had personal finance knowledge.
Those results are not too far off of another survey showing that 42% of households nationwide had the same general understanding.
When I read this article I was certainly positive towards it. They all sound like good people and I wish them the best. But after a day of thinking on it, I realize it’s not going to work. We’re way past the point where an election here or there is going to change anything. Conservatives are stuck in this “Waiting for Superman” (to borrow the title of that lame movie) mode and he’s not coming. There will not be a super-Reagan, ever. And even the real Reagan wasn’t Reagan all the time. It’s too late, folks. If we are to have any hope of stopping the country’s plunge into catastrophe and despotism, we must take to the streets. And we’re going to have to strike. And I don’t mean a big demonstration every year or so. I mean something different: a continuous presence, an in-your-face highly visible statement that will be civil in tone but firm. We will be telling the dominant liberal culture that the game is over, and we are be going away.
We’re going to be taking to the streets anyway once the catastrophe hits, once our health care has stopped, once our retirement is confiscated and we’re starting to worry about our food supply. But we’ll just be doing crazy, stupid things and no good will come of it. We need to get off this reactive, letter-to-the-editor, wow-did-I-do-something-or-what routine. And when we do this, we have to understand that the left will hate us (but they will anyway no matter what we do), the republican establishment will disown us (surprise! they already have) and even most of the conservative establishment will as well (just read the good losers at National Review if you have doubts). I wish it weren’t so, but it’s the only way. There’s not going to be a general armed uprising. Localized, yes, I can see that but such events will be quickly crushed and just give the leadership the excuse it needs to impose martial law. Or your could pray for a military dictatorship to take over. That’s possible, once nuclear weapons start hitting us.
Wow, beenthere, please put your tinfoil hat back on. We don’t need to “take to the streets” – we need to go to the ballot box and vote for GOP/Tea Party candidates. Some Tea Party rallies won’t hurt, and will probably help, but that doesn’t mean “taking to the streets.”
If Obama is re-elected, maybe it would be time to create some civil unrest, but not now. We need to vote for the GOP candidate no matter what.
beenthere – get a grip on reality. We are are well poised to defeat Obama in November – at the ballot box. Please feel free to march in the streets (alone), but occupying the streets is better left to the Occupiers, who are disgracing the Dem/Lib establishment.
You are allowing yourself to sink into despair, and that is never a good place to go, whatever the reason.
The reason things seem so bad, and the reason there is so much room to fall, is because we have been so incredibly successful.
Think about the struggles our ancestors faced. Think of all of the tragedy and wars and disease and fear and tyrannies and horrors we humans have always had to deal with.
Life is about fighting to hold back the dark the best we can. It is not about winning. It is about the struggle.
There are good things happening. They are sometimes hard to understand. As the culture of Western Civilization erodes there is a beauty and truth that is rising to meet the rot and decay head on.
You can see it right here.
I have my moments of despair as well.
Here is a concrete example that government rollback is possible from our neighbors up north:
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/02/15/conservatives-and-enthusiasts-cheer-the-end-of-the-long-gun-registry/
It’s just a start, but it shows proof of concept.
Whatever you think of Brown, this is good news for the GOP taking control of the Senate.
Hey Dexter,
I thought Brown was toast. This is good news. Now, if he could live up to his Conservative statements…
What? Colin Powell isn’t available?