See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On March 5th, 2012 at 7:57 pm, sicoit said:

   BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Idiots, they really thought teh won would “share his wealth” with their peon selves? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Morons….they STILL think they’re important. He’s going to poop on them as he does the rest of us.
   BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! *inhale*

2. #2
   On March 5th, 2012 at 8:01 pm, spaceycakes said:

   You can’t see the eyes of the demon, until him come callin’
   –King Willie

3. #3
   On March 5th, 2012 at 8:27 pm, Hangfire said:

   Barry will not spare the price of one tie fighter if it takes away from construction on his re-election Death Star.

4. #4
   On March 5th, 2012 at 8:30 pm, rocketman said:

   ***
   Did you see how fast Sheriff Joe Biden bailed out of the dunk (dunce?) tank fundraiser?
   ***
   It happened about a millisecond after FLYOVERMAN offered to provide the free dunk tank. With real live Great Whites to “liven up” the event! And all this time I believed that Biden would think that it was just another band. Maybe he is really smarter than I think.
   ***
   John Bibb
   ***

5. #5
   On March 5th, 2012 at 8:31 pm, backwoods conservative said:

   I hear they’ve even canceled plans for a “Joe Biden dunk tank” fundraiser at the rallies of various swing-district Dems. Bummer.

   Oh, man! I was so looking forward to that. I’d donate a dollar to them for the chance to dunk Plugs.

6. #6
   On March 5th, 2012 at 8:32 pm, AlohaGuy said:

   What happened to “spread the wealth around”?

   No, no, it’s “spread the birth control around.”

7. #7
   On March 5th, 2012 at 8:35 pm, AlohaGuy said:

   Former President Bill Clinton has agreed to make joint appearances with President Barack Obama

   Obama: “Did someone say ‘joint’?”

   Bill: “Free birth control for co-eds – why didn’t I think of that?”

8. #8
   On March 5th, 2012 at 8:36 pm, Hangfire said:

   On March 5th, 2012 at 8:32 pm, AlohaGuy said:

   Hey, had enough rain?

9. #9
   On March 5th, 2012 at 8:40 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

   I wonder. It’s pretty clear that few of the Dems see any coattails to ride to re-election so cutting off the Obama money would make sense for “optics”. But couldn’t they get money from his PACS?

   The way money is managed this year, even money and who is providing it is subject to interpretation. The same money will arrive in the same coffers but without the bothersome linkage.

10. #10
    On March 5th, 2012 at 8:40 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Very encouraging to see that Obama doesn’t have enough campaign finances to share. Seems like a lot of his worshipers from 2008 have converted to another religion. Maybe they are giving all their money to Greenpeace now instead of Obama. Whatever, his halo is kinda tarnished, doncha know.

11. #11
    On March 5th, 2012 at 8:41 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Hangfire said:

    Hey, had enough rain?

    Rain?

12. #12
    On March 5th, 2012 at 8:43 pm, OK_Loyalist said:

    1st off, how can low-life’s have high-level talks?

    And speaking of Omaha, it’s now known of as ‘Obamaha‘

13. #13
    On March 5th, 2012 at 8:47 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    On March 5th, 2012 at 8:40 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Don’t worry, Obama has plenty of money. Intrade still has him as a 2:1 favorite which reflects his 2:1 money advantage over Romney. No one else has any real money.

14. #14
    On March 5th, 2012 at 8:50 pm, dat60a3 said:

    That shows that Obama isn’t a socialist. He’s a communist!

15. #15
    On March 5th, 2012 at 9:03 pm, paulie said:

    Think the media will ever figure out that he’s not their pal either?

16. #16
    On March 5th, 2012 at 9:17 pm, txvet2 said:

    On March 5th, 2012 at 8:50 pm, dat60a3 said:

    It’s just his funny kind of capitalism. They give him the capital, and he keeps it.

17. #17
    On March 5th, 2012 at 9:22 pm, DBNinKY said:

    President Barack Obama has a bleak message … You’re on your own.

    And why should he change? Obama’s been saying it to hurting Americans since he assumed office.

    Obama ignored Kentuckians trying to recover from a deadly ice storm a few years back and is doing the same after this horrific series of tornadoes.

18. #18
    On March 5th, 2012 at 9:28 pm, Mister P said:

    A tyrant does not need congress. Just beware of the ides of March.

19. #19
    On March 5th, 2012 at 9:42 pm, DBNinKY said:

    Former President Bill Clinton has agreed to make joint appearances with President Barack Obama … .

    There is NO WAY in heck Clinton really wants to see another two-term Democrat president, free to compete with his own ignoble legacy and lucrative book sales and speaking engagements in just four years.

20. #20
    On March 5th, 2012 at 9:48 pm, OK_Loyalist said:

    On March 5th, 2012 at 9:42 pm, DBNinKY said:

    There is NO WAY in heck Clinton really wants to see another two-term Democrat president, free to compete with his own ignoble legacy and lucrative book sales and speaking engagements in just four years.

    Monica Crowley brought this up on her weekend radio show.

21. #21
    On March 5th, 2012 at 9:50 pm, babiesgrandma said:

    Ha Ha Ha! The top demonuts just got Fluked!!! Ha Ha Ha!

22. #22
    On March 5th, 2012 at 9:52 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Obowmao: Suckahs!

    King Willy: Truly dread mon!

23. #23
    On March 5th, 2012 at 10:03 pm, peteee said:

    obama won’t send money to his own kin, what makes anybody think he would give them any money?

24. #24
    On March 5th, 2012 at 10:05 pm, sb36695 said:

    It’s getting crowded under the bus!

25. #25
    On March 5th, 2012 at 10:05 pm, Republicanvet said:

    ” I hear they’ve even canceled plans for a “Joe Biden dunk tank” fundraiser at the rallies of various swing-district Dems. Bummer.”

    Gee, hold it in a red state and that blithering idiot will be under water so much more than the left did for the housing market that Bite Me would have to grow gills.

    …but then, he’s already got a blowhole so maybe he would be safe.

    Aw hell, lets risk it anyway.

26. #26
    On March 5th, 2012 at 10:10 pm, Republicanvet said:

    It’s quite telling Bubba has joined the fray (for something substantial in return I’m sure) because Oblahblah is doing so poorly with women. It couldn’t just be a sandra Fluke….which explains that whole circus. Are women still swooning over that old lech?

27. #27
    On March 5th, 2012 at 10:14 pm, OK_Loyalist said:

    Oh, now isn’t this ironic …

    Obama shifts location of G-8 summit from hometown of Chicago to his Camp David retreat

    White House national security spokesman Tommy Vietor simply said that Camp David, the rustic retreat in the mountains of Maryland, was a setting that would allow for more intimate discussions among the G-8 leaders. He said security and the possibility of protests were not factors in the decision, noting that Obama would still host the NATO summit in his hometown of Chicago from May 20-21.

    Who’s BS meter isn’t pegged over this ?

28. #28
    On March 5th, 2012 at 10:14 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On March 05, 2012 at 07:03 pm, paulie said:
    

    Think the media will ever figure out that he’s not their pal either?

    Depends. Jake Tapper seems to have inklings given his whining the other day about Urkel going after reporters involving classified stuff.

    The rest are just frogs waiting for the water temp to rise to a comfy level.

29. #29
    On March 5th, 2012 at 10:19 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On March 05, 2012 at 07:22 pm, DBNinKY said:
    

    President Barack Obama has a bleak message … You’re on your own.

    And why should he change? Obama’s been saying it to hurting Americans since he assumed office.

    Obama ignored Kentuckians trying to recover from a deadly ice storm a few years back and is doing the same after this horrific series of tornadoes.

    You’d think some suck-up reporter would give him a heads-up over the bad optics. Instead, in his budget proposal to Congress, he cut the budget for information technology for the weather service so bad that most will be gone, reassigned or fired by October. The very people who make it possible to receive weather and he is cutting them.

30. #30
    On March 5th, 2012 at 10:49 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Ah……. the captain throwing the rats off the sinking ship.

31. #31
    On March 5th, 2012 at 11:18 pm, stuckinIL4now said:

    On March 5th, 2012 at 10:14 pm, OK_Loyalist said:

    Oh, now isn’t this ironic …

    Obama shifts location of G-8 summit from hometown of Chicago to his Camp David retreat

    Oh yeah, this just took up the first 10 minutes of the 10pm news on local All Borerack Channel affiliate WLS. I’m surprised Mayor “tiny dancer” Rahmbo isn’t stomping his feet in protest over it–he’s missing his big chance to ingratiate himself with the G8 ahead of his 2016 Prezuhduncial run. On that weekend in May the Sox and Cubs will be playing the first half of the annual Crosstown Classic at Wrigley and don’t laugh because that’s a big event in this city and even though the remaining NATO summit is at McCormick place which is closer to Baraka’s Cominskey Park on the South Side, there’ll be a lotta hyped-up angry drunken baseball fans crawling all over the city to clash with the protestors who still plan to demonstrate the NATO part of the summit.

32. #32
    On March 5th, 2012 at 11:26 pm, conservative hispanic said:

    O?T:

    Obama to Bibi: You’re on your own.

33. #33
    On March 6th, 2012 at 12:01 am, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    Hopefully, this will work to our advantage.

    Having less money for the DNC, that’s usually a very good thing.

    But I think it’d be great to see some glaring photos of Obama and democrats together.

34. #34
    On March 6th, 2012 at 12:16 am, Jethro said:

    Is this a concession that Team Obama doesn’t think the democrats have a chance to retake the House and hold the Senate? Given that the make up of the House is in flux due to redistricting by Republican state legislatures and the Senators up for reelection rode in on the “Hate Bush” wave this seems like a practical move. But this makes even more puzzling the Republican Elite’s love affair with Mitt Romney. They have been telling us that if Romney is not the nominee the Republicans will lose the House and not take back the Senate. What does it say about their expertise if the democrats are now conceding Congress?

35. #35
    On March 6th, 2012 at 6:54 am, DBNinKY said:

    This proves two things: 1.) Americans vote their wallets and Team Obama knows that his dismal record on the economy cannot be defended, even w/ a billion dollars and the MSM in their back pocket; 2.) Obama is thinking ahead to his legacy and wants a second term w/ Republicans in charge of both Houses so he, like Clinton before him, can claim the role of “sagacious centrist” merely by approving most everything they pass.

    It won’t work, though. For despite the media’s happy economic talk and cooked polls, too many Americans are hurting financially to ever vote reelect a failed president like Obama.

    Monica Crowley brought this up on her weekend radio show.

    Good! A colleague and I discussed this last fall, when we noticed how few people on the right were analyzing Clinton’s role in the 2012 election.

36. #36
    On March 6th, 2012 at 7:03 am, DirkDiggler said:

    How much is media love for Obama and Dems in general worth, every election?

    Look at whats happening with Romney now:

    ABC’s “What Would You Do?” this weekend, featuring a Mormon young man verbally abusing and dumping his fiance because he “found out” that she had had premarital sex.

    SNL–showcasing supposed “Romney sons” as a kind of “Stepford boys”.

    Anybody notice that the new Batman movie’s villain is named “Bane”? Bain Capital, anyone?

    And the NYPost ran an article yesterdayabout the Mormon practice of “baptizing” non-adherents…highlighting the “baptism” of Daniel Pearl–the Jewish-American victim of that horrendous videotaped execution by Muslim terrorists.

    As Romney tightens the screws on the nomination, Obama’s unpaid (?) MSM and entertainment media is gearing up for the kneecapping of Mormonism.

    So how much money does Obama really need?

37. #37
    On March 6th, 2012 at 7:23 am, DBNinKY said:

    So how much money does Obama really need?

    Excellent point, Double-D! The priceless free media support Obama and the Dems receive negates the need for campaign cash.

38. #38
    On March 6th, 2012 at 8:31 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    Obummer humming Pink Floyd:

    Money
    Well, get back
    I’m all right Jack
    Keep your hands off of my stack
    
    Money
    It’s a hit
    Don’t give me that do goody good bull$hit
    I’m in the high-fidelity Air Force traveling set
    I think I need a Jumbo jet

    Money
    It’s a crime
    Share it fairly
    But don’t take a slice of my pie

39. #39
    On March 6th, 2012 at 9:07 am, swede said:

    Dexter Alarius said:

    Obummer humming Pink Floyd:

    Heh.

40. #40
    On March 6th, 2012 at 9:10 am, Paratus said:

    Hey Dexter I like your change of words in Floyd’s “Money”.

41. #41
    On March 6th, 2012 at 9:12 am, dan708 said:

    Personally, I think Obungle is hanging on to the campaign ca$h for his future use as a legal fund for himself. He’ll need it.

42. #42
    On March 6th, 2012 at 9:24 am, Dave Turson said:

    The Campaigner-in-Chief will still be fundraising at DCCC and DSCC events. He’s spreading himself around – only his personal money-pot is not to be touched. I think his supporters call this a double Obammy-Whammy.

43. #43
    On March 6th, 2012 at 9:35 am, spaceycakes said:

    Lil’ Obowwow: damn it feels good to be a gangsta.

44. #44
    On March 6th, 2012 at 9:38 am, happyscrapper said:

    On March 5th, 2012 at 8:47 pm, Pasadena Phil said:
    On March 5th, 2012 at 8:40 pm, happyscrapper said:
    Don’t worry, Obama has plenty of money. Intrade still has him as a 2:1 favorite which reflects his 2:1 money advantage over Romney. No one else has any real money.

    As soon as people know for sure Romney is the nominee, money will start pouring in from people who were just waiting to see where their money should go. I plan to support whoever gets the nomination with my money and my “talents”. I just didn’t want to waste it on someone who doesn’t make it.

    Oh, and a comment about the press going after Mormonism…how stupid do they think the American People are? No need to answer. I also think there are a lot of supid people out there. But what does the Mormon religion have to do with anything? Do they want us to believe that Romney would get into office and mandate we all change to Mormon? Or, maybe Mitt would force all the churches to adopt Mormon practices that goes against their consciences? Nah, I think Obama has that covered. This is another attempt to obfuscate the issue of how horrible things are going with this doofus in office.

    They WILL NOT WIN ON THE REAL ISSUES, AND THEY KNOW IT. Their solution? Mormon-bashing. Yeah, that’ll work.

45. #45
    On March 6th, 2012 at 9:57 am, conservative hispanic said:

    DirkDiggler:

    Sorry, pal. Bane has been a main Batman villain for decades. I recall back in the mid 90s that Bane broke Batman’s back, put him out of action for months. So him being in the new Batman movie is just a coincidence. No conspiracy there.

46. #46
    On March 6th, 2012 at 10:23 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    Okay, Rich Lowery’s article at National Review just sent chills up my spine:

    What could congressional Republicans do to stop the auto bailouts? Nothing. The Libya War? Nothing. The Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing? Nothing. They objected to the administration’s dithering on the Keystone pipeline, so they included a requirement that President Obama make a decision in an unrelated piece of must-pass legislation. He escaped this clever trap — by rejecting the pipeline.

    This is the tale of congressional frustration when Republicans have been united. There’s no guarantee that they will remain so if their numbers diminish next year and if their standing with the public remains low. A cataract of tax increases set for 2013 will give the president invaluable leverage in budget negotiations. As ever, he will have outsized influence in setting the agenda. With one speech, he can take income inequality from an animating issue in Zuccotti Park to an animating issue in the national debate.

    He will presumably replace the liberal Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who will be 80 in 2013, with another liberal who will serve for another 30 years. If Justice Anthony Kennedy or Justice Antonin Scalia steps aside (both were born in 1936), he gets the opportunity to shift the balance of the court for decades.

    There is no presidential election that is not said to be the most important in our lifetime. It was even said in 1996, when Bill Clinton won a decisive but not particularly consequential victory over Bob Dole. But Clinton had been chastened by the Republican sweep in 1994, and in a period of peace and prosperity, the country could afford to debate the meaning of “is.” Now, we are truly at an inflection point, between the Barack Obama and Paul Ryan approaches to government, between consolidation of the past three years of historic government expansion and rollback.

    The downbeat musings on the right are driven by the dreary primary season and the belief that the party’s nominee will be weak. But so is the president, who leads likely nominee Mitt Romney only narrowly even after Romney’s season of self-inflicted wounds. For Republicans, the general election is still winnable, and there is no substitute for victory.

    Even having majorities in Congress, there is too much damage the Executive branch can do. We MUST win the Presidency! I don’t care if Arnold Ziffel is the candidate! We MUST support him!

47. #47
    On March 6th, 2012 at 10:35 am, conservative hispanic said:

    Dexter Alarius:

    This is EXACTLY what I’ve been saying for months!!

    This article should be required reading for all the “If (insert candidate name) wins, I’m voting third party, or not voting at all” idiots.

48. #48
    On March 6th, 2012 at 10:44 am, DirkDiggler said:

    Con Hispanic:

    Yeah, maybe I’m overdoing it a bit, but just look at the other examples I posted from just one March weekend. Just because we’re paranoid doesn’t mean someone isn’t trying to kill us, eh?

    In an earlier, pre-adult life, I was more of a Spiderman guy, but knew enough about Batman to know Bane, who was probably the best villain of the series.

    No time for any of that stuff anymore, just THEOhioState football and regular “2-minutes-hate” political blog sessions. And chicken wings. Always chicken wings…

49. #49
    On March 6th, 2012 at 10:47 am, Mister P said:

    happyscrapper, Romney has plenty of other things to go after other than his mormon religion. He is your staid old white guy and a life long member of the 1 percent, who also is fond of socialized medicine. His wife has 2 cadillacs to show their humble lifestyle. He has no use for tea partiers or the GOP base. I don’t see this guy beating Obama.

50. #50
    On March 6th, 2012 at 10:50 am, Mister P said:

    For Republicans, the general election is still winnable, and there is no substitute for victory.

    And don’t forget the Romney advisor is Sununu who recommended one of those current liberal supreme court justices. Don’t count on Romney to do anything but grow the government.

51. #51
    On March 6th, 2012 at 11:00 am, OK_Loyalist said:

    On March 6th, 2012 at 10:23 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    Okay, Rich Lowery’s article at National Review just sent chills up my spine:

    Even having majorities in Congress, there is too much damage the Executive branch can do. We MUST win the Presidency! I don’t care if Arnold Ziffel is the candidate! We MUST support him!

    Too bad Arnold isn’t running

    YouTube pulled the clip of Arnold in a WWI pilots hat & goggles sitting in a bar and Foster Brooks comes in and orders a drink with him… It’s a classic and I would of posted it.

52. #52
    On March 6th, 2012 at 11:58 am, thejim said:

    I witnessed the mainstream media’s effect on the average citizen this past weekend, and it is disconcerting at best. It is absolutely amazing how little the average citizen knows when their only source of news & information is their television set.

53. #53
    On March 6th, 2012 at 12:19 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On March 6th, 2012 at 11:58 am, thejim said:
    I witnessed the mainstream media’s effect on the average citizen this past weekend, and it is disconcerting at best. It is absolutely amazing how little the average citizen knows when their only source of news & information is their television set

    Ask the average citizen if he/she thinks he is “informed”. If they are like my sister, they will say yes. Then ask where they get their information. Most watch 1/2 hour MSM news like CBS, etc. in the evening and that is it. And they think they get all the news they need to be informed. People who THINK they are informed are worse than being totally UNINFORMED!

    I actually worked with a lady who never watched ANY news, either world or local. She didn’t have a home computer and she didn’t read newspapers. She might as well be living in a cave. A dumber person I have never met.

54. #54
    On March 6th, 2012 at 12:20 pm, Flyoverman said:

    But so is the president, who leads likely nominee Mitt Romney only narrowly even after Romney’s season of self-inflicted wounds. For Republicans, the general election is still winnable, and there is no substitute for victory.

    Romeny is the least likely to win between Ginrich, Santorum, and Romney. He’s a ripe target for Obama and there is no real enthusiasm for him in the base.

    The dilema is if Santorum or Gingrich is nominated the GOP, the elites, and the establishment Republicans will abandon them. They would rather lose than support a conservative of any degree.

    If I have any more cheery news, I will get back with you,

55. #55
    On March 6th, 2012 at 12:57 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Romney may be a very bad candidate for us. But he will be the one…count on it. Only a miracle will give the nomination to Santorum. Pray for that miracle. This country has had those miracles in the past…how else do you explain a bunch of rag-tag farmers defeating the mighty British Military in 1775? Miracles happen, but God is probably is bit peeved with this country right now. I pray He will still listen to us.

56. #56
    On March 6th, 2012 at 1:29 pm, Dave Turson said:

    Famous last words while on a campaign trail:

    “This race isn’t going to be won or lost in the fall on money. This race is going to be won or lost on someone who can capture the imagination of the American people.” – Rick Santorum, yesterday.

57. #57
    On March 6th, 2012 at 2:02 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Romeny is the least likely to win will stomp Obama by the least margin between Ginrich, Santorum, and Romney.

    Stop with the negative vibes, Moriarty!

58. #58
    On March 6th, 2012 at 2:03 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On March 06, 2012 at 12:02 pm, Dexter Alarius said:
    

    Romeny is the least likely to win will stomp Obama by the least margin between Ginrich, Santorum, and Romney.

    Stop with the negative vibes, Moriarty!

    Awesome movie!

59. #59
    On March 6th, 2012 at 2:23 pm, drbulb said:

    Stop with the negative vibes, Moriarty!

    Big Joe to GOP candidates: The reason you can’t hear me is because you’re firing your mortars at your end, and they’re dropping here, on our end! No, 0bama’s not here! We’re here! Just lift your godd@mned barrage!

    Right on ‘vet…Excellent movie!

60. #60
    On March 6th, 2012 at 2:41 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Right on ‘vet…Excellent movie!

    Yes, but the GOP needs to start firing more than just paint rounds. Trap the Dem Tiger, find their weak spot, and hit them with armor piercing rounds.

61. #61
    On March 6th, 2012 at 3:02 pm, right_on said:

    I’ve often wondered; if there is a limit on the amount “a person” can contribute to a re-election campaign, and party, how can all those fundraiser/dinners charge $35,000 a head? And, it can’t go to Superpacs, because it would violate federal election law.

62. #62
    On March 6th, 2012 at 3:08 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    Heh…this makes me think of “no honor among thieves.” Obeyme is either keeping this money for himself, helping out cronies who are working for his reelection, or squirreling it away to eventually pay off those who may finally vet him. This is how Chicago thugs operate. Those Dem ijjitts in CONgress who supported this tyrant in office should have known this would happen–no sympathy from me.

63. #63
    On March 6th, 2012 at 3:37 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On March 06, 2012 at 12:41 pm, Dexter Alarius said:
    

    Right on ‘vet…Excellent movie!

    Yes, but the GOP needs to start firing more than just paint rounds. Trap the Dem Tiger, find their weak spot, and hit them with armor piercing rounds.

    Every time a democrat speaks, it smells like someone fell into a dung heap.

    Kinda reminds you of home doesn’t it ‘ol buddy?

64. #64
    On March 6th, 2012 at 5:22 pm, Collateral Damage said:

    That’s Obastard for ya! Now he’s even shafting his own party!?! What new?

65. #65
    On March 6th, 2012 at 5:29 pm, Bluefighter said:

    Sounds like Obama wants all the money to himself so he can be a step closer of becoming a dictator. He does not want to have a three ring circus running past 2013. Send him back to Keyna before Electorial College have a chance to vote him in.

66. #66
    On March 6th, 2012 at 7:49 pm, ChapBix said:

    #30. On March 5th, 2012 at 10:49 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Ah……. the captain throwing the rats off the sinking ship.

    The lucky rats!

67. #67
    On March 6th, 2012 at 7:51 pm, ChapBix said:

    #32. On March 5th, 2012 at 11:26 pm, conservative hispanic said:

    O?T:

    Obama to Bibi: You’re on your own.

    The American people to Barry: You’re on your own.

68. #68
    On March 6th, 2012 at 7:58 pm, ChapBix said:

    #36. On March 6th, 2012 at 7:03 am, DirkDiggler said:

    Begs the question of how many people/groups Obama and his loyal core in the Lazy Main Stream Media can continue to alienate and lose and still win re-election?

69. #69
    On March 6th, 2012 at 8:07 pm, ChapBix said:

    #46. On March 6th, 2012 at 10:23 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    I am not amused by those (Neal Boortz comes to mind) who say Obama would wipe the floor with Santorum and would clean Romney’s clock in the general election. WHY is there little mention of Obama’s flaws and vulnerabilities? He has as many, if not more, points to attack as either Romney, Santorum or Gingrich.