Lockheed accepts Obama’s ‘guidance’ and will delay sending tens of thousands of layoff notices until after the election
**Written by Doug Powers
As we discussed on Saturday, the Obama administration has offered to cover expenses (court-ordered penalties, severence costs, etc) for contractors willing to ignore the WARN Act by delaying sending layoff notices to tens of thousands of their employees who will likely be hit by Pentagon budget cuts.
Following up on that, today, Lockheed Martin said “count us in”:
Lockheed Martin said Monday it will not issue employee layoff notices this year, ending an election-year showdown with the Obama administration.
The company said it based its decision on new guidance issued Friday by the Office of Management and Budget and the Pentagon.
The guidance said the Pentagon did not anticipate killing any contracts on Jan. 2, the day automatic spending cuts are set to begin hitting defense spending. The guidance also said the federal government would cover severance costs that are mandated under a federal layoff notices law.
The decision by Lockheed means tens of thousands won’t get layoff notices days before Election Day, which might have cast a crucial blow against President Obama’s reelection chances.
Republicans argue that last week’s guidance was a politically motivated effort by the administration to protect Obama ahead of the election.
We’ve seen bank bailouts and auto bailouts — welcome to the Obama re-election effort bailout.
And the inevitable hypocrisy:
In 2007, Democrats led by Sherrod Brown, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton proposed the Forewarn Act, which would have strengthened the WARN Act by expanding the number of companies under the law’s jurisdiction and requiring 90 days’ notice. The bill didn’t go anywhere. Now, apparently, the president not only opposes the principles underlying legislation he himself supported, he opposes WARN entirely.
What’s not being answered is this: The Obama administration is arguing that the WARN Act isn’t applicable in cases involving sequestration. If that’s true, why are they putting taxpayers on the hook to cover costs the WARN Act mandates if that law doesn’t apply to this situation?
**Written by Doug Powers
Twitter @ThePowersThatBeblog comments powered by Disqus
Obama administration to contractors: Hold off announcing layoffs until after the election and taxpayers will cover your fines and costs
September 29, 2012 04:36 PM by Doug Powers
John Boehner suggests tax plan previously proposed by Nancy Pelosi; ‘Not a serious proposal’ says… Pelosi
December 18, 2012 03:28 PM by Doug Powers
January 16, 2013 02:44 PM by Doug Powers
November 8, 2012 09:27 AM by Michelle Malkin
October 31, 2012 09:56 AM by Michelle Malkin
Daily Caller» Bill Maher: GOP guilty of ‘treason’; Michael Moore: ‘They hate America’
Gay Patriot» Scandal central? Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing?
Daily Caller» David Brooks: ‘We as a country have become over-addicted to scandal’
Green Room» Two House Dems demand Lerner resignation after using lobbyist to stage modified limited hangout
Green Room» New liberal idea: Let’s raise $660 million online in a month to buy the LA Times before the Koch brothers can
Green Room» Feelgood video of the day
Gay Patriot» Meanwhile, at Obama’s EPA. . .
Gay Patriot» What took the IRS so long to come clean about the scandal?