Did You Know...

   

Hillary Clinton on Benghazi: My responsibility

Share
By Doug Powers  •  October 15, 2012 10:42 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton granted an interview with CNN live from underneath the bus, and it was one that the White House will welcome… at least for now:

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Monday tried to douse a political firestorm around the deadly assault on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya, saying she is responsible for the security of American diplomatic outposts.

“I take responsibility” for the protection of U.S. diplomats, Clinton said during a visit to Peru. But she said an investigation now under way will ultimately determine what happened in the attack that left four Americans dead.

The attack on the night of September 11 killed Chris Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya, and three other Americans at the American consulate in Benghazi.
[…]
Clinton said President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden are not involved in security decisions.

“I want to avoid some kind of political gotcha,” she added, noting that it is close to the election.

It’s worth mentioning that one of the topics at Tuesday’s Obama/Romney spar will be national security, so Hillary saying she wants to “avoid political gotcha” by absorbing responsibility for Benghazi the day before the debate doesn’t feel genuine no matter what the motive. But what about the administration’s evolving spin on this story does feel genuine?

However, like any prudent government leader managing a crisis, Hillary delegated the blame.

Meanwhile, are preparations underway for a “Baracktober surprise”?

Administration officials say the White House has put special operations strike forces on standby and moved drones into the skies above Africa, ready to hit militant targets from Libya to Mali, if U.S. investigators can find the al-Qaida-linked group responsible for the death of the U.S. ambassador in Libya.

But the officials say the administration also is weighing whether the short-term payoff of being able to claim retribution against al-Qaida is worth the risk that such strikes would be ineffective and rile governments in the region.

Details were provided by three current and one former administration official, as well as an analyst who was approached by the White House for help. All four spoke only on condition of anonymity.

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

blog comments powered by Disqus

In the best of hands: AG Loretta Lynch travels to Orlando in search of terrorist’s motive, comes up empty

June 21, 2016 03:13 PM by Doug Powers

lynchmotive

Uh huh

Of course: Obama admin releasing Orlando terrorist call transcripts, with certain ‘edits’; Update: Backpedal alert!

June 20, 2016 06:55 AM by Doug Powers

obamalynch

Redacted, for YOUR protection

Yosemite Nat’l Park hosts climate change lecture from Smoggy the Bear; Vin Scully not feeling the Bern (Open thread)

June 19, 2016 09:14 AM by Doug Powers

obamacopter

Hypocrisy Landing

New York Times editorial board falls on grenade of reality to save lib narrative

June 15, 2016 09:01 PM by Doug Powers

denial

Un-freaking-real

Ex-prez with 24/7 armed security: More guns make us less safe

June 15, 2016 07:23 AM by Doug Powers

billhill1

“Likely that more people would have been killed” in Orlando if somebody else had been armed.


Categories: Guns, Terrorist attacks, Bill Clinton, 2016 Campaign

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook