Did You Know...

   

‘Climate scientists’ attempt to explain 20-year hiatus in temperature rise

Share
By Doug Powers  •  April 1, 2013 11:42 AM

**Written by Doug Powers

In a mid-March article published in the Weekly Standard called In Denial, Steven Hayward asked the following question:

Eventually the climate modeling community is going to have to reconsider the central question: Have the models the IPCC uses for its predictions of catastrophic warming overestimated the climate’s sensitivity to greenhouse gases?

The Australian ran an article over the weekend that dovetails with that question. Here’s the first sentence:

DEBATE about the reality of a two-decade pause in global warming and what it means has made its way from the sceptical fringe to the mainstream.

There are a couple other ways that could have been phrased:

1) “‘Consensus of scientists’ starting to wonder if ‘consensus of scientists’ were wrong”

2) “Al Gore spotted releasing nitrous oxide into atmosphere while personally feeding baked beans to herd of cattle”

More:

In a lengthy article this week, The Economist magazine said if climate scientists were credit-rating agencies, then climate sensitivity – the way climate reacts to changes in carbon-dioxide levels – would be on negative watch but not yet downgraded.

Another paper published by leading climate scientist James Hansen, the head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, says the lower than expected temperature rise between 2000 and the present could be explained by increased emissions from burning coal.

For Hansen the pause is a fact, but it’s good news that probably won’t last.

International Panel on Climate Change chairman Rajendra Pachauri recently told The Weekend Australian the hiatus would have to last 30 to 40 years “at least” to break the long-term warming trend.

But the fact that global surface temperatures have not followed the expected global warming pattern is now widely accepted.

Research by Ed Hawkins of University of Reading shows surface temperatures since 2005 are already at the low end of the range projections derived from 20 climate models and if they remain flat, they will fall outside the models’ range within a few years.

“The global temperature standstill shows that climate models are diverging from observations,” says David Whitehouse of the Global Warming Policy Foundation.

“If we have not passed it already, we are on the threshold of global observations becoming incompatible with the consensus theory of climate change,” he says.

Whitehouse argues that whatever has happened to make temperatures remain constant requires an explanation because the pause in temperature rise has occurred despite a sharp increase in global carbon emissions.

At what point do the “consensus of scientists” become the “fringe skeptics” as reality plays out? (as long as there’s big money in it, never)

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

blog comments powered by Disqus

Gore / great lakes

May 20, 2015 09:08 PM by Doug Powers

gorebear

Consistency offsets

Heir apparent to Al Gore proves he’s totally up to the challenge

March 22, 2015 09:32 AM by Doug Powers

pharrell

“Without Pharrell our planet would not survive,” says indoctrinated youth.

Changing climate for 2016? Al Gore heading to Iowa next month

March 4, 2015 07:23 AM by Doug Powers

gorebear

Checking temperatures?

Great Lakes’ failure to cooperate with Al Gore’s doomsday alarmism a sure sign of climate change, says Bill Nye

February 19, 2015 08:32 PM by Doug Powers

goreangry

Foiled again

Bill Nye shares climate change proof: The Wyoming hills are alive with ‘science’!

February 10, 2015 10:04 AM by Doug Powers

billnye

Up on Clown Mountain


Categories: Al Gore, Enviro-nitwits, global warming

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook