Did You Know...


‘Climate scientists’ attempt to explain 20-year hiatus in temperature rise

By Doug Powers  •  April 1, 2013 11:42 AM

**Written by Doug Powers

In a mid-March article published in the Weekly Standard called In Denial, Steven Hayward asked the following question:

Eventually the climate modeling community is going to have to reconsider the central question: Have the models the IPCC uses for its predictions of catastrophic warming overestimated the climate’s sensitivity to greenhouse gases?

The Australian ran an article over the weekend that dovetails with that question. Here’s the first sentence:

DEBATE about the reality of a two-decade pause in global warming and what it means has made its way from the sceptical fringe to the mainstream.

There are a couple other ways that could have been phrased:

1) “‘Consensus of scientists’ starting to wonder if ‘consensus of scientists’ were wrong”

2) “Al Gore spotted releasing nitrous oxide into atmosphere while personally feeding baked beans to herd of cattle”


In a lengthy article this week, The Economist magazine said if climate scientists were credit-rating agencies, then climate sensitivity – the way climate reacts to changes in carbon-dioxide levels – would be on negative watch but not yet downgraded.

Another paper published by leading climate scientist James Hansen, the head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, says the lower than expected temperature rise between 2000 and the present could be explained by increased emissions from burning coal.

For Hansen the pause is a fact, but it’s good news that probably won’t last.

International Panel on Climate Change chairman Rajendra Pachauri recently told The Weekend Australian the hiatus would have to last 30 to 40 years “at least” to break the long-term warming trend.

But the fact that global surface temperatures have not followed the expected global warming pattern is now widely accepted.

Research by Ed Hawkins of University of Reading shows surface temperatures since 2005 are already at the low end of the range projections derived from 20 climate models and if they remain flat, they will fall outside the models’ range within a few years.

“The global temperature standstill shows that climate models are diverging from observations,” says David Whitehouse of the Global Warming Policy Foundation.

“If we have not passed it already, we are on the threshold of global observations becoming incompatible with the consensus theory of climate change,” he says.

Whitehouse argues that whatever has happened to make temperatures remain constant requires an explanation because the pause in temperature rise has occurred despite a sharp increase in global carbon emissions.

At what point do the “consensus of scientists” become the “fringe skeptics” as reality plays out? (as long as there’s big money in it, never)

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

blog comments powered by Disqus

Sex in the balance: CNN sounds alarm about the latest thing climate change is killing

November 6, 2015 10:19 PM by Doug Powers


If you can’t get a date you can always jump a shark

Ramp up the fear mongering! New study predicts Miami, New Orleans will be under water *soon due to global warming

October 12, 2015 09:12 PM by Doug Powers


Another “peer reviewed” urinal cake

Obama’s Alaska trip to sound the global warming alarm has really turned into a snow job

September 27, 2015 10:51 AM by Doug Powers


“Staredown” worked!

Attn Hillary: Dems encouraging Al Gore to run for president again (meanwhile, Dukakis waits patiently next to a rotary phone)

August 14, 2015 06:48 AM by Doug Powers


There isn’t yet enough Middle East oil money behind the idea

Hillary Clinton proves she’s ready to be Obama’s climate change successor

July 28, 2015 05:04 AM by Doug Powers


Saving the environment, one private jet ride at a time

Categories: 2016 Campaign, Al Gore, Enviro-nitwits, Hillary Clinton

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook