Did You Know...

   

Charles Rangel files lawsuit against House members to overturn censure

Share
By Doug Powers  •  April 22, 2013 07:53 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

null

In December of 2010, the Democrat-controlled House voted 333-79 to make Charlie Rangel the first member in 27 years to be censured. Shortly after that, Rangel delivered his “old, tax evading congressmen never die, they just refuse to be shamed away” speech.

Rangel shouldn’t even still be in Congress, but instead of just being happy to be living proof of a swamp undrained, Charlie’s decided to take it a step further and sue to get his censure overturned:

Democratic Rep. Charles Rangel is suing Speaker John Boehner and six other lawmakers, alleging problems with the House ethics investigation that led to his censure in 2010.

In a complaint filed Monday in U.S. District Court in Washington, the New York Democrat alleges “numerous, flagrant, knowing and intentional violations” of his due process rights.
[…]
The lawsuit names Boehner; Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., who was chairwoman of the House ethics committee at the time of the censure; and other committee members and staff. The congressman alleges that evidence was withheld by the committee staff.

In the suit, Rangel alleges that he suffered “irreparable harm that cannot be compensated by money damages.” Rangel claims to just want to correct an injustice and isn’t after money, which he has plenty of — thanks to, you know… not paying taxes on stuff for so long.

As Jeff Dunetz pointed out at The Lid, you’ll notice at no point does Rangel claim his innocence.

When Rangel alleges there was “evidence withheld by the committee staff,” we’re not quite sure he Charlie’s referring to material that would have cleared him of the charges, or trying to prove that the committee’s decision should be overturned because there was a whole lot more evidence against him they incompetently forgot to introduce, and as such weren’t fit to judge him.

Considering all the evidence against Rangel, the fact that the ethics panel recommended censure instead of expulsion was in itself proof of a corrupt system. However, Rangel probably won’t take that angle to discredit the committee because it would require arguing that he’s a much more crooked than he was given proper credit for. Or maybe he will — nothing would be surprising.

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

blog comments powered by Disqus

Taxpayer-funded astroturf: NYC Health Dept staffers encouraged to join immigration protest during work hours

June 24, 2016 09:18 PM by Doug Powers

deblasio

Unfortunately there’s no amnesty from the BS

Looks like Hillary’s server wasn’t the only thing that could be scrubbed with a cloth

June 24, 2016 01:52 PM by Doug Powers

hillaryshrug

She’s transparent, all right

Brexit vote open thread (Bonus: former US presidential candidate spots end of British empire); Update: David Cameron will step down

June 23, 2016 10:24 PM by Doug Powers

brexit

Dean of exaggerations

In the best of hands: AG Loretta Lynch travels to Orlando in search of terrorist’s motive, comes up empty

June 21, 2016 03:13 PM by Doug Powers

lynchmotive

Uh huh


Categories: Feature Story, Guns, Public Officials, Terrorist attacks, Barack Obama, Democrats

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook