Did You Know...

   

Charles Rangel files lawsuit against House members to overturn censure

Share
By Doug Powers  •  April 22, 2013 07:53 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

null

In December of 2010, the Democrat-controlled House voted 333-79 to make Charlie Rangel the first member in 27 years to be censured. Shortly after that, Rangel delivered his “old, tax evading congressmen never die, they just refuse to be shamed away” speech.

Rangel shouldn’t even still be in Congress, but instead of just being happy to be living proof of a swamp undrained, Charlie’s decided to take it a step further and sue to get his censure overturned:

Democratic Rep. Charles Rangel is suing Speaker John Boehner and six other lawmakers, alleging problems with the House ethics investigation that led to his censure in 2010.

In a complaint filed Monday in U.S. District Court in Washington, the New York Democrat alleges “numerous, flagrant, knowing and intentional violations” of his due process rights.
[…]
The lawsuit names Boehner; Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., who was chairwoman of the House ethics committee at the time of the censure; and other committee members and staff. The congressman alleges that evidence was withheld by the committee staff.

In the suit, Rangel alleges that he suffered “irreparable harm that cannot be compensated by money damages.” Rangel claims to just want to correct an injustice and isn’t after money, which he has plenty of — thanks to, you know… not paying taxes on stuff for so long.

As Jeff Dunetz pointed out at The Lid, you’ll notice at no point does Rangel claim his innocence.

When Rangel alleges there was “evidence withheld by the committee staff,” we’re not quite sure he Charlie’s referring to material that would have cleared him of the charges, or trying to prove that the committee’s decision should be overturned because there was a whole lot more evidence against him they incompetently forgot to introduce, and as such weren’t fit to judge him.

Considering all the evidence against Rangel, the fact that the ethics panel recommended censure instead of expulsion was in itself proof of a corrupt system. However, Rangel probably won’t take that angle to discredit the committee because it would require arguing that he’s a much more crooked than he was given proper credit for. Or maybe he will — nothing would be surprising.

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

blog comments powered by Disqus

‘Careful what you ask for,’ socialist-style: NH delegate count gives Bernie Sanders his dream of ‘fairness’

February 11, 2016 07:47 AM by Doug Powers

hillarybernie

There seems to be some sort of lesson here

Smart Power™ update: Obama admin expresses ‘disgust’ at latest move by Iranian partners in peace

February 10, 2016 08:33 PM by Doug Powers

kerry9

State Dept. readying obligatory strongly worded letter, James Taylor

While the focus was on New Hampshire, SCOTUS knocked the teeth out of Obama’s Clean Power Plan

February 10, 2016 07:58 AM by Doug Powers

obamaskyrocket

Necessary skyrocketing of energy prices put on hold

Last-ditch Clinton strategy to win NH: Discredit Bernie Sanders by likening him to… the Clintons

February 8, 2016 08:11 PM by Doug Powers

billclinton

New winning strategy: Projection

Anti-Wall St. crusader Hillary Clinton explains accepting $675k from Goldman Sachs: ‘That’s what they offered’

February 3, 2016 09:43 PM by Doug Powers

hillary3

Progressive capitalism explained


Categories: Media, Corruption, Hillary Clinton, 2016 Campaign

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook