Did You Know...

   

Reuters: Boston bombers didn’t obey existing gun laws, which will add fuel to calls for more gun laws

Share
By Doug Powers  •  April 22, 2013 12:22 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

Our headline of the day is a real shocker:

null

Big surprise — criminals didn’t obey laws:

The two suspects in the Boston Marathon bombings were not licensed to have the firearms they used in several shootouts with police on Friday, Reuters reported Sunday night.

So what’s the answer? Since they didn’t obey the laws already on the books, maybe more laws for them to ignore would have helped:

The news that the suspects were not authorized to own firearms will likely add fuel to calls for tougher gun laws – an issue that was put on the back-burner last week after the Senate blocked the central elements of a gun-control package backed by President Obama.

Because Massachusetts state law bars handgun ownership for those younger than 21, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, age 26, was the only brother who could have obtained a license from the town of Cambridge, Mass., where he lived. But he didn’t take that step, Dan Riviello, spokesman for the Cambridge Police Department, told Reuters.

Maybe a separate law with slightly different wording that had “seriously, pay attention to this one – we’re not kidding” written in bold would have gotten their attention.

null

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

blog comments powered by Disqus
~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's Email List:

The New York Times’ war on gun-owning rape victims

October 31, 2014 08:28 AM by Michelle Malkin

Hicken-weasel: Why Colorado’s gutless guv is in trouble

September 24, 2014 08:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

Mega-hypocrite Michael Bloomberg’s anti-gun group ironically shoots own argument in foot

July 30, 2014 10:34 PM by Doug Powers

momsdemand

Defenselessness is the best defense?


Categories: Guns, Michael Bloomberg

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook