Did You Know...

   

House GOP report: Hillary Clinton lied under oath about additional Benghazi security request

Share
By Doug Powers  •  April 24, 2013 01:57 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

John Kerry (and no doubt Hillary Clinton) would rather everybody just drop this and move on to more important things, but we won’t. Here’s latest in the Benghazi investigation by way of CNN:

House Republican leaders released a report Tuesday on the deadly terror attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, in which they claim former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton personally signed off on cuts in security at the compound, which they say would contradict her congressional testimony.

The September 11, 2012, attack resulted in the deaths of U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

The 46-page report by Republicans on five House committees cites a request from then-U.S. Ambassador to Libya Gene Cretz, sent last March 28 to Clinton asking for additional security resources, and a response dated last April 19 that bears Clinton’s signature.

The April cable from the State Department, according to the GOP report, “acknowledged then-Ambassador Cretz’ formal request for additional security assets but ordered the withdrawal of security elements to proceed as planned.”

The response from the State Department, which the GOP report cites, recommended the agency’s diplomatic security officials conduct “a joint reassessment of the number of (security) agents requested for Benghazi.”

The report cites e-mails from one U.S. embassy employee in Tripoli saying that answer “looks like no movement on the full complement of personnel for Benghazi, but rather a reassessment to bring the numbers lower.”

At a congressional hearing about three months ago, Hillary testified that any requests for additional security in Benghazi never reached her desk:

Dems and a large portion of the mainstream press (with notable exceptions) will continue to try and keep this all swept under the rug through 2016.

Jay Carney’s response? Come on you guys, Hillary signed everything — that doesn’t mean she saw it:

Also:

“The Administration willfully perpetuated a deliberately misleading and incomplete narrative that the attacks evolved from a political demonstration caused by a YouTube video. U.S. officials on the ground reported – and video evidence confirms – that demonstrations outside the Benghazi Mission did not occur and that the incident began with an armed attack on the facility,” the report says. “Senior Administration officials knowingly minimized the role played by al-Qa’ida-affiliated entities and other associated groups in the attacks, and decided to exclude from the discussion the previous attempts by extremists to attack U.S. persons or facilities in Libya.”

Video from CBS News:

Hillary responds to that House report:

null

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

blog comments powered by Disqus

Hillary at the White House

March 24, 2015 09:11 AM by Doug Powers

obamahillary

The story straightening

Time: Hillary Clinton’s emails weren’t even read before they were deleted

March 12, 2015 03:51 PM by Doug Powers

nakedgun

“Nothing to see here,” part 361.

NYT: Dems have to stick with Hillary because ‘she’s the whole plan’

March 12, 2015 07:00 AM by Doug Powers

officer

No place else to go

Trust her: Hillary Clinton only deleted personal emails, like the ones that Bill never sent

March 10, 2015 09:16 PM by Doug Powers

hillaryemail1

The couple that lies together, stays together

Place your bets: Who will Hillary blame for her email troubles at today’s UN presser?

March 10, 2015 09:15 AM by Doug Powers

hillary1

“Climate change” comes in at 3 to 1 odds


Categories: 2016 Campaign, Barack Obama, Corruption, Democrats, Hillary Clinton

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook