Did You Know...

   

3 forgotten facts about the Fort Hood jihad attack

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  August 7, 2013 09:26 AM

6_27_111209_hasancard
Image credit: Pamela Geller

3 forgotten facts about the Fort Hood jihad attack
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2013

Finally. Four years after Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan walked into the Soldier Readiness Processing Center at Fort Hood, Texas, and perpetrated the bloodiest massacre ever on an American military base, the self-confessed jihadist’s court martial proceedings began this week. Have you forgotten?

Americans obsessed over the O.J. Simpson, Casey Anthony and Jodi Arias trials. Gun-control lobbyists turned Newtown, Aurora and Tucson into national awareness-raising, fundraising and legislation-promoting campaigns. But where are the celebrity lobbyists and high-profile advocates for the victims of bloodthirsty Muslim vigilante Nidal Hasan?

The White House, which downplayed the terrorist mass murder as “workplace violence,” exacerbated national apathy for his evil acts. Our soldiers deserve better. Here are three facts you’ve probably forgotten — or never knew — about the Fort Hood terror spree.

Fourteen victims fell on Nov. 5, 2009, not 13. Thirteen of our U.S. military personnel died in cold blood at the deployment center. But the death toll was actually 14. Pvt. Francheska Velez, 21, was pregnant when Hasan shot her during the first round of gunfire. At a military Article 32 hearing in 2010 (analogous to a civilian grand jury hearing), a survivor of the Fort Hood shootings testified that Velez cried out, “My baby! My baby!”

In his opening statement on Tuesday, Hasan (acting as his own lawyer) apologized to his fellow jihadists for not destroying more innocent life.

The victims were all unarmed. Soldiers inside the deployment center were and are forbidden from carrying weapons — either issued weapons or personal arms — on base. When Hasan commenced his shooting spree by shouting, “Allahu Akbar,” several brave men and women in uniform used chairs, tables and their own bodies to try to stop him. But it wasn’t until a courageous, armed civilian police officer, Sgt. Kimberley Munley, arrived on the scene with her 9mm Beretta that Hasan’s rampage was interrupted.

In a gunfight outside the deployment center, Munley wounded Hasan — who was able to return fire and shot her in the hand, thigh and knee. While she lay on the ground, Hasan kicked away her weapon. Another armed civilian police officer, Mark Todd, was able to fire at Hasan five times and brought him down.

Gun-control zealots led by the Brady Campaign To Prevent Gun Violence exploited Fort Hood to argue for even tighter gun restrictions. But it was a 1993 Clinton administration gun-control directive banning most military personnel from carrying their arms for personal protection that facilitated Hasan’s massacre except under very limited circumstances. Despite the death of 13 soldiers and the wounding of more than 30 at Fort Hood by a jihadist who warned his superiors that Muslim soldiers posed a specific threat, gun-free military base policies remain in place.

Hasan’s military colleagues were more concerned with being accused of discrimination than with ridding our military of this known, deranged Islamic radical. In 2007, two years before he carried out his homicidal plan, Hasan laid out his murderous means, motives and Koranic inspiration for all to see.

His PowerPoint slide presentation to fellow Army doctors was titled: “The Koranic World View As It Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military.” Hasan warned: “It’s getting harder and harder for Muslims in the service to morally justify being in a military that seems constantly engaged against fellow Muslims.” And: “We love death more then (sic) you love life!” As first reported by Pamela Geller, Hasan carried an official calling card with the designation “SoA (SWT)” — for “Soldier of Allah” and “Subhanahu Wa Ta’ala” (Islamic for “Glory to Him, the Exalted”).

Hasan told his superiors he was not alone among Muslim soldiers who believed they “should not serve in any capacity that renders them at risk to hurting/killing believers unjustly.”

He reminded the Army of the fatal 2003 fragging attack on American soldiers in Kuwait by Sgt. Hasan Akbar (who was sentenced to death but remains alive while his case drags on in appeal) and the desertion case of Lebanon-born Muslim Marine Wassef Ali Hassoun.

A Joint Terrorism Task Force had been monitoring Hasan’s communications with jihad spiritual leader Anwar al-Awlaki all along. But the military was not notified. Even without that information, military officers expressed concerns privately that Hasan might leak classified information to terror groups if he were deployed and that he was capable of committing a fragging.

Yet, they were prepared to deploy him anyway and did nothing to remove him from his job. One email from an Army investigator before the Fort Hood massacre fretted: “Had we launched an investigation of Hasan we’d have been crucified.”

Instead, 13 soldiers and one unborn child were slaughtered and paid with their lives for our country’s reckless political correctness and bureaucratic fecklessness.

  • Tom8

    Hasan has committed perfidy by fighting in the uniform of the enemy, in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention. He is therefore an unlawful combatant and war criminal that should have been shipped immediately to Guantanamo, subject to a military tribunal instead of a court-martial, and executed. The Obama Administration, and much of the public at large, lack the fortitude to call him what he is, and to treat him accordingly.

  • http://angelforisrael.wordpress.com angelforisrael

    Reblogged this on Taking Back America.

  • Ron

    As soon as I stop vomiting I’ll write a comment.

  • http://americanpatriotrealitycheck.wordpress.com/ American Patriot

    Reblogged this on Reality Check and commented:
    3 forgotten facts about the Fort Hood jihad attack

  • http://coffeedialog.wordpress.com jhester1964

    The police officers should have shot to kill.

  • Lynne Larson

    As usual Michelle , you hit the nail on the head….I can only hope the military can push to change these rules against arming themselves on base, otherwise more PC problems. THANK YOU as always for the exposé! So sad!!!!

  • Victoria Hougen

    Being politically correct has rubbed me the wrong way from the beginning. I don’t think side-stepping the truth because someone might be offended ever works.
    These are incredibly difficult and complex times in which each of us need to toughen up. Being overly-sensitive and thinned skinned helps no one. People need to be offended from time to time in or for the truth to be served.
    Imagine our world today with these 13 soldiers and 1 lovely child living in it still!
    Theirs aren’t the only lost lives to the insanity of “political correctness”, surely. Their loved ones surely do.
    In closely no matter how much longer this country stays on this insanity trek, remember this…The Truth Will Out!
    regardless of whether its politically correct or not.

  • http://disturbeddeputy.wordpress.com disturbeddeputy

    Reblogged this on disturbeddeputy and commented:
    Never forget.

  • cucu5

    You forgot the victim of the attack that committed suicide. He should be considered as another murder perhaps at the hands of the administration that refuses to call the shooting an act of terrorism. Their classification of it as workplace violence has further victimized the victims by limiting their benefits.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Colorado’s anti-fracking crack-up

August 31, 2016 06:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

Did Hillary not consider all these deleted Benghazi emails work-related? (Quick, somebody hand her another pickle jar!)

August 30, 2016 02:25 PM by Doug Powers

hillarypickles1

Was that a pickle jar or can of worms?

Ignorance = Bliss: John Kerry tells the media how they can help fight (public perception of) terrorism

August 29, 2016 09:43 PM by Doug Powers

kerry9

What you don’t know can’t hurt you, unless it can

Of course: DOJ advises employers to ignore this immigration law to avoid discrimination charges (Open thread)

August 28, 2016 10:09 AM by Doug Powers

confused

Catch-22’s We Can Believe In!

Leo DiCaprio’s dirty dollars

August 24, 2016 11:32 AM by Michelle Malkin


Categories: Enviro-nitwits, Feature Story

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook