Did You Know...


John Kerry on proposed Syria attack: It’ll be ‘unbelievably small’

By Doug Powers  •  September 9, 2013 11:53 AM

**Written by Doug Powers

It’s on, Bashar!

In a rhetorical sense, the verbal build-up to a proposed attack on Syria has been the Mother of All Bombs. Secretary of State Kerry lit another fuse on that particular MOAB with the below statement. Let it never be said that Kerry is trying to sound over-intimidating:

“We’re not going to war,” Mr. Kerry told reporters Monday after meeting with British Foreign Secretary William Hague in London. “We will be able to hold [Syrian President] Bashar al-Assad accountable without engaging troops on the ground or any other prolonged kind of effort, in a very limited, very targeted, very short-term effort that degrades his capacity to deliver chemical weapons without assuming responsibility for Syria’s civil war. That is exactly what we are talking about doing; an unbelievably small, limited kind of effort.”

If Kerry’s not careful, Monty Python’s Spanish Inquisition will sue him for copyright infringement.

Kerry has also drawn his own red line, reportedly giving the Syrian leader one week to hand over his chemical weapons stash or face either a re-drawing of the red line or unbelievably small attack. If that doesn’t make Assad wet himself, nothing will.

What is the goal of the proposed strikes? The Obama administration seeks to hamper Assad’s ability to eat Cheerios, or something:

The strike, as envisioned, would be limited in the number of targets and done within a day or two. It could be completed in one fell swoop with missiles, said one senior official familiar with the weapons involved. A smaller, follow-on strike could be launched if targets aren’t sufficiently damaged.

A second senior official, who has seen the most recent planning, offered this metaphor to describe such a strike: If Assad is eating Cheerios, we’re going to take away his spoon and give him a fork. Will that degrade his ability to eat Cheerios? Yes. Will it deter him? Maybe. But he’ll still be able to eat Cheerios.

I see — force him to take a fork to a spoon fight. That’s a goal not unlike General Eisenhower’s plan to limit Hitler’s ability to consume asparagus.

Overthinking that strategy, if you thought somebody was dangerous, why would you take away his spoon and replace it with a fork?

In any case, “The Cheerio Offensive” will be discussed in war colleges for centuries to come — mostly around breakfast time.

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

blog comments powered by Disqus

Climate change getting so bad the State Dept. has issued a worldwide travel warning

November 24, 2015 09:49 AM by Doug Powers


Way to go, climate deniers!

Obama to Pentagon: Hurry up with an excuse for why I told everybody ISIS was contained when it obviously wasn’t

November 23, 2015 07:49 PM by Doug Powers


Desperately seeking scapegoats

Josh Earnest: The president’s actions say more about what he believes than his words, or something

November 18, 2015 08:00 AM by Doug Powers



John Kerry: No rationale for terrorist attack in Paris because nobody published an offensive cartoon like Charlie Hebdo

November 17, 2015 03:47 PM by Doug Powers



After jihadists attack Paris, a resolute Obama lectures Republicans about intolerance

November 16, 2015 09:04 PM by Doug Powers


Obama’s straw men among those seeking asylum

Categories: Al Qaeda, Barack Obama, Democrats, Terrorist attacks, Turkey

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook