Did You Know...

   

Obama laments how the Founding Fathers are messing up the Dems’ quest for total control

Share
By Doug Powers  •  May 24, 2014 02:36 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

At a Thursday fundraiser in Chicago, President Obama perfectly illustrated why the Founders included the “two U.S. Senate seats per state regardless of population” rule in the Constitution:

“Obviously, the nature of the Senate means that California has the same number of Senate seats as Wyoming. That puts us at a disadvantage,” Mr. Obama said.

The Founding Fathers decided in the “Great Compromise” in 1787 to apportion House seats based on population and give each state two seats in the Senate regardless of population. The solution was a compromise between large states and small states in a dispute that nearly dissolved the Constitutional Convention.

The president also blamed “demographics” for the inability of the Democratic Party to gain more power in Congress, saying Democrats “tend to congregate a little more densely” in cities such as New York and Chicago. He said it gives Republicans disproportional clout in Congress.

“So there are some structural reasons why, despite the fact that Republican ideas are largely rejected by the public, it’s still hard for us to break through,” Mr. Obama said.

In other words, “it’s a real problem for us that the Founders gave a bunch of backwards country hicks in flyover states certain protections from out-of-control enlightened coastal and big city liberal elites.” Ironic to hear precisely the kind of mindset that inspired Founders to include that protection in the Constitution complain about how unnecessary it is.

This isn’t really a new topic for Obama. A week earlier he “joked” about convincing big city libs to move to red states:

At a fundraiser in New York City on Wednesday night, Obama told a story about a woman in Brooklyn who asked what more she could do to help the president.

“And I said – ‘move to North Dakota,'” Obama joked.

As the crowd laughed, Obama explained that “If I could just get about a million excess votes in Brooklyn out to Nebraska (or) Wyoming, we’d be doing okay – I don’t need 80% of the vote here.”

By the way, whoseideas are largely rejected by the public”?

null

null

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

Schatz-Care? Because the ACA’s working GREAT, Senate progs push single-payer proposal

September 12, 2017 10:01 AM by Doug Powers

The Grubering continues

Is there a DACA in the House? The perils of Pen & Phone decrees exposed again

September 5, 2017 10:01 AM by Doug Powers

Another temporary legacy bites the dust

Confirmed: Iran president really misses previous administration

August 15, 2017 08:44 AM by Doug Powers

Uh huh

Obama’s birthday gives uber-objective media a chance to show how much he’s missed

August 4, 2017 08:57 PM by Doug Powers

Like this, but worse

Paul Krugman serves up more proof Nobel Prize needs ‘comedy’ category

August 1, 2017 05:40 PM by Doug Powers

Obama the Honest


Categories: Barack Obama, Health care, New York Times, Paul Krugman