Did You Know...

   

Hey MSM, how many times do Hillary’s emails need to ‘renew questions’ about Clinton graft before they’ve answered them?

Share
By Doug Powers  •  August 10, 2016 05:03 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

null
Constant lies have renewed questions about their honesty

Have you noticed that it’s common practice whenever the Clintons again get caught red-handed for a large segment of the media to say the evidence has “renewed questions” about their honesty and integrity? The latest State Department email dump to Judicial Watch provided more examples…

New York Times:

A new batch of State Department emails released Tuesday showed the close and sometimes overlapping interests between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department when Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state.

The documents raised new questions about whether the charitable foundation worked to reward its donors with access and influence at the State Department, a charge that Mrs. Clinton has faced in the past and has always denied.

NPR:

A fresh batch of previously-unreleased State Department emails are raising new questions about the relationship between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department during the years Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State.

Fox News:

A new batch of emails released Tuesday is raising fresh questions about whether Clinton Foundation donors got preferential treatment from the State Department during Hillary Clinton’s tenure at the top.

This kind of thing doesn’t “raise more questions” about the incestuous relationship between the Clinton Foundation and State Department under Hillary Clinton — it answers them… again.

The latest batch of emails shows Hillary’s aides at the State Department working to get someone involved with the Clinton Foundation, whose name was redacted, a State job. The Clinton Foundation also worked with State to help out foreign governments as long as they could pay it back in certain ways:

Recall the State Department praising the progress of Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan as the president’s ally invited Bill Clinton to give two speeches in exchange for $1.4 million dollars. The State Department’s generous assessment of Jonathan’s human rights record stopped after the last speaking gig for Clinton.

The only “question” raised by things like that is “how are they not in jail?”

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

Shocker: FBI was ‘unable to preserve and retrieve’ some texts from Trump-hating agent

January 22, 2018 05:28 AM by Doug Powers

Plus: Lynch already knew “no charges will be brought” against Hillary

Dare to dream: Newsweek renews hope for Hillary fans

January 18, 2018 06:57 PM by Doug Powers

Sad

Dems boycotting Trump SOTU might leave some empty seat opportunity for GOP

January 16, 2018 10:53 AM by Doug Powers

Seat fillers

Schiff-ting narrative… Out: Russia collusion! In: Whatever, but Trump IS mentally unfit!

January 7, 2018 01:25 PM by Doug Powers

Like a Roomba for phony election loss excuses

Shocker: Guess what else was on Anthony Weiner’s laptop (Update: But HOW?)

December 30, 2017 04:08 PM by Doug Powers

There but for the grace of Comey


Categories: 2016 Campaign, Corruption, Hillary Clinton