See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Silent Running
2. Sekimori.org - Live Blog
3. ebony ass whipped ass latin ass nice asses jennifer lopez ass thick ass great ass ass lick
4. girls giving head spice girls girls masturbating hot girl cute girls girls names girl masterbating girls home alone

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #1
   On July 15th, 2004 at 1:42 pm, Bill from INDC said:

   You friggin’ RAWK Malkin.

2. #2
   On July 15th, 2004 at 1:42 pm, Bill from INDC said:

   R-A-W-K. Rawk!

3. #3
   On July 15th, 2004 at 1:47 pm, michele said:

   Thank you, Michelle.

4. #4
   On July 15th, 2004 at 1:48 pm, Rockynoggin said:

   Heh! “a group of non-promiscuous women working is Washington who don’t accept money for anal sex!”

   Did you have to toss the liberals a softball like that?

5. #5
   On July 15th, 2004 at 1:50 pm, Rockynoggin said:

   Uh, you may also want to edit out your email address - unless that’s one you don’t care about spammers and haters having?

6. #6
   On July 15th, 2004 at 1:55 pm, Rocket Man said:

   Actually, Michelle is such a stand-up girl that she freely publicizes her actual email address. We know for sure it produces some hate mail, as she printed an appalling example in a post a few days ago. But Michelle is not one to be intimidated by haters (let alone spammers), which is one reason we love her!

7. #7
   On July 15th, 2004 at 1:57 pm, Ith said:

   Thank you, Michelle!

8. #8
   On July 15th, 2004 at 1:59 pm, rightwingduck said:

   So this lady gets famous for having anal sex for $400 a pop?
   I wonder if the article will mention whether or not her rates have gone up.

9. #9
   On July 15th, 2004 at 2:00 pm, Thomas said:

   Oh, brother. Doesn’t the Washington Post have a Paul Bremer speech to cover? Oh, wait.

   The last paragraph of that e-mail was priceless, Ms. Malkin!

10. #10
    On July 15th, 2004 at 2:07 pm, Chris said:

    ummm…that last line of the email kind of insinuates that they are working washington women that only give anal sex for free, but DON”T accept any money…..

    just kiddin’ Michelle!

11. #11
    On July 15th, 2004 at 2:07 pm, Monkey Boy said:

    Michelle, You are awesome.

    Hats off to you.

12. #12
    On July 15th, 2004 at 2:09 pm, actus said:

    So when asked to comment on something, you just pitch yourself and your stories. And then share it with the rest of us. what wonderful indignation.

    Non-promiscuous, non-anal sex money makers ARE everywhere in Washington, which is why they’re not news. Anyone who wants to hear about one can just go meet them.

    I’d say the news on washingtoniene is that she does seem to have a strange sort of DC morality — she refuses to out the Bush appointee that paid her for sex. I think thats BIG news, and very moral for this town.

13. #13
    On July 15th, 2004 at 2:09 pm, Bithead said:

    (A slight, respectful bow)

    Were that more like you were around.

14. #14
    On July 15th, 2004 at 2:13 pm, Julie Anne Fidler said:

    Good for you, Michelle!
    I can’t tell you how much I respect you for taking a stand like that.

15. #15
    On July 15th, 2004 at 2:13 pm, H said:

    Doesn’t Wonkette’s husband work at the Post??

    Can’t see what Ms. Cutler has done to merit that kind of attention from the Washington Post. There’s gotta be no more than, say, 2 or 3 hundred more deserving young women in Washington. You know - the young disciplined ones that know have to volunteer for the good cause of their choice and don’t make any noise about it.

    But I digress. You did good, pilgrim!

16. #16
    On July 15th, 2004 at 2:20 pm, Malaclypse The Tertiary said:

    I’m so proud of you.

    Look, I don’t dispute the ubiquity of the “Girls Gone Wild” culture, nor do I dispute its vacuousness. I do, however, find conservative hand-wringing about the matter to be much ado about nothing. Here’s a hint: Try positive argumentation. Tell us why your vision for society is better and let the best idea win. That’s right, I’m a South Park Republican and proud of it. I prefer the competing lifestyles vision to the “whatever the Southern Baptist Convention deems appropriate” vision.

17. #17
    On July 15th, 2004 at 2:22 pm, Expertise said:

    *LOL* You are a trip. This Wonkette feud might be your calling. It gets funnier everytime you update it.

    http://expertise.blogdrive.com

18. #18
    On July 15th, 2004 at 2:24 pm, Digger said:

    $400 bucks!

    Sheesh the prices are going down.

19. #19
    On July 15th, 2004 at 2:25 pm, Jeff G said:

    Jessica who’s this now…?

20. #20
    On July 15th, 2004 at 2:32 pm, Malaclypse The Tertiary said:

    Hey Michelle,

    That promo pic of you on your blog is soooo hot; it seems pretty prurient and salacious to me. The windswept hair; the pout; looking right at the camera (one of the most time-tested devices employed by photographers to intimate eroticism incidentally.) Gosh, (said with big blinking doe eyes,) I would have to be pretty cynical to think that photo is employing these sexual undertones as part of the Malkin brand.

21. #21
    On July 15th, 2004 at 2:43 pm, Skerdog said:

    Gee, looking at the Post’s “history of prize-winning journalism”, I was struck by the wording of this one:

    2004 - for International Reporting, by Anthony Shadid for his extraordinary ability to capture, at personal peril, the voices and emotions of Iraqis as their country was invaded.

    “invaded” ?!? How about “liberated”, you asshats!

22. #22
    On July 15th, 2004 at 2:52 pm, Steve Skubinna said:

    Michelle, I think you should do some guest appearances in Frank J.’s “In My World” series. I see you as a complement to the Rumsfeld Strangler - the Malkin Eviscerator.

23. #23
    On July 15th, 2004 at 3:18 pm, Martin aka Blogbat said:

    Another example of the perverted Left trying to “moralize” the rest of us with such an article, then using you as their example of a frothy-mouthed conservative who just wants to spoil everybody’s fun- and all of their precious made-up rights. Poo. Good call, Ms. Malkin.

24. #24
    On July 15th, 2004 at 3:32 pm, Juliette said:

    You go, girl!

    MTT: Attractive features are not the fault of the attractive. The converse is true, of course, for ugly people.

    Would it be more acceptable if she posted a picture with her hair sticking up and with unbrushed teeth?

25. #25
    On July 15th, 2004 at 4:16 pm, Steve Skubinna said:

    Juliette, you are missing MTT’s point. He is saying that since Michelle is totally cute (I dunno, is it proper to refer to a married woman and mother as a “babe?”) she is being hypocritical to disapprove of Wonkette’s cheesy whoring.

    Wow, good one. What a zinger! Having an attractive picture is the same as being a prostitute. Glad all of my photos look dorky, that makes me a pillar of moral rectitude.

26. #26
    On July 15th, 2004 at 4:29 pm, Kevin Brady said:

    This is GREAT! Nice letter. Keep it up.

27. #27
    On July 15th, 2004 at 4:44 pm, Erik said:

    Excellent and hysterical letter, Michelle!!! Glad to see at least one conservative willing to take the gloves off and go for the knockout punch. Now, would you please proceed over to Capitol Hill and teach some of our spineless “Republican representatives” how to do this?

    (quotes since their status as Republicans and representatives are both in serious question)

28. #28
    On July 15th, 2004 at 4:50 pm, Jack Tanner said:

    April’s now given up her job at the Post for streetwalking.

29. #29
    On July 15th, 2004 at 5:46 pm, Kay Harrison said:

    Michelle! You go, Girl! You’re my hero(ine)!

30. #30
    On July 15th, 2004 at 7:42 pm, Athena said:

    Ahh, I’d like to go to the CLB Policy Inst. event. It would be great to get to hear you speak.

    If I have a chance, I’ll introduce myself as that weird girl in the basement that has a blog. =)

31. #31
    On July 15th, 2004 at 10:36 pm, Tom the Redhunter said:

    Michelle you are my hero.

    I’m remembering once again why I dropped my subscription to the Post some twenty years ago.

    Actually, I’d never heard of this Jessica Cutler until I read your post and followed the link. Shows how out of the leftie culture I am, I guess.

32. #32
    On July 16th, 2004 at 12:53 am, Chris Ashworth said:

    Michelle, would you please consider
    writing a kick-ass book that fully
    examines the absolute fraudulence of
    the left’s claim that promiscuity
    empowers women and teenaged girls? As
    you know, nothing could be further from
    the truth.

    You would be the ideal author to expose
    the staggering cost that each of us
    either directly or indirectly pays for
    this extreme deception.

    Thanks,

    Chris Ashworth

33. #33
    On July 16th, 2004 at 11:03 am, memer said:

    All this Wonkette-bashing is embarrasin. You should keep all your wonkette-envy under (tight) wraps. Better yet, don’t hate, appreciate.

34. #34
    On July 16th, 2004 at 11:39 am, Bill from INDC said:

    Wonkette-envy?

    First of all, the focus is on Cutler, a woman who took $400 bucks for a pop in the can, not the woman who held her out to the world like a heroine, and then proceeded to irrevocably wed herself to the narrative with “exclusive” coverage and carefully stages faux-lez photos that were conventiently stolen from an unguarded server by “accident,” AT THE HEIGHT OF THE SCANDAL.

    Oh wait, now I’m Wonkette bashing. What an envious hater I am.

35. #35
    On July 16th, 2004 at 1:33 pm, Trapped Inside the Beltway said:

    I would buy a copy of the Washington Post (rather than reading it online for free) if the magazine section had a story about Michelle. I would buy several copies if there were photos. Does anyone know if she has an available sister? ;o)

36. #36
    On July 16th, 2004 at 6:56 pm, Kid Handsome said:

    What I don’t understand about Wonkette is her odd endorsement of Cutler as some sort of empowering Beltway symbol that women can make their own choices about their lives, etc. (ad nauseum), while at the same time she calls the Bush twins Skanks.

    So far as I’m aware, the Bush twins are not paid for sex.