Who’s freaking out?
Following the lead of anonymous air marshals (see Eric Leonard’s KFI news story), some in the blogosphere are piling on Annie Jacobsen. One blogger calls her a “sniveling little twit.” Kevin Drum pooh-poohs “Panic in the Skies.” Armed Liberal advises Annie to take a “chill pill.” And Commissar at Politburo Diktat writes:
We are freaking out. Panicking. Overreacting. Getting jumpy. For Chrissakes, GET A GRIP, comrades. We (I mean Ms. Jacobsen) are, by the words of our federal air security officials, creating a danger in the air.
I respectfully take issue with this characterization. Let’s remember what exactly Annie and Kevin Jacobsen did on their flight. By one unnamed marshal’s own words:
Jacobsen and her husband had a number of conversations with the flight attendants and gestured towards the men several times, the source said.
Who’s freaking out? The unnamed marshals who spoke to KFI are popping veins over the Jacobsens for having merely discussed their concerns with the flight crew and “gestured towards the men.” The couple didn’t jump up and scream “We are going to die!” They didn’t faint or have heart attacks. And they didn’t confront the 14 Syrians while they all stood up before landing, went to the bathroom, and congregated in the aisles in violation of security regulations. (No one confronted them, for crying out loud. That is the problem.)
The Jacobsens didn’t even muster up the courage to say meekly to the Syrians, “Hey, could you please sit down. You are making me nervous.” And they didn’t blab to other passengers about their fears.
The Jacobsens talked to the flight attendants and they kept to themselves. In fact, in their MSNBC interview, Kevin Jacobsen said he sat quietly with his wife and son during the landing and resignedly wrote about his concerns in his journal. Out-of-control menaces in the air? Come on.
The message that the alarmed and panicked marshals are sending out is that if and when we view suspicious behavior, we should all just sit tight in our seats, shut up, and do nothing until it’s too damned late lest we possibly risk blowing their cover.
Meanwhile, Tom Ridge and Norm Mineta ask us all to be vigilant, buy our duct tape, hand over our nail clippers and knitting needles, keep our lips sealed, and relinquish complete control and responsibility for homeland defense–and self-defense–to The Professionals.
Two words: Hell, no.
(Now, read this: When government failed: Passengers of Flight 93 saved America from even greater horror.)
***
Some annoyed bloggers wonder why I keep “flogging” this subject. For the same reasons they keep discussing it themselves: Very simply, it’s interesting and it’s important and there’s much to learn here about how both the government and citizens should properly respond to real and perceived homeland security threats. If you’d rather read about what the Bush twins are wearing and who saw whom at what restaurant, you are in the wrong zip code.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
- The Laughing Wolf
- The Spoons Experience
- Captain's Quarters
- Rox Populi
- Blogs of War
- InTheBullpen.com
- Serenity's Journal
- BLACKFIVE
- Right Moment
- Twisted Spinster
- Tom McMahon
- Dean's World
- Winds of Change.NET
- LilacRose
- Who Tends the Fires
- damnum absque injuria
- Media Lies
- The Blue State Conservatives
- The Blue State Conservatives
- The Blue State Conservatives
- planck's constant
- planck's constant
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Airline Security, Annie Jacobsen, Norm Mineta
Right Wing Nut House
» IRAN OPENS SECOND FRONT AGAINST ISRAEL
PoliPundit.com
» Porn Industry Wants Bailout

NewsBusters.org
» Australian Press Reports American Taxpayers 'Miffed' John Howard Is Staying At Blair House Over Obamas
Power Line
» Best Behavior?
protein wisdom
» More Jihad in Britain [Dan Collins]
TigerHawk
» Harry meets Ann: A question of categories
Yourish.com
» Jimma dandy to the rescue
Sound Politics
» D-I-V-E-R-S-I-F-Y
protein wisdom
» JTP Now JTR [Dan Collins]
protein wisdom
» Jimmy Crater on the Preventable War in Gaza [Dan Collins]
Gateway Pundit
» Lebanese Terrorists Fire Missiles on Northern Israel!






Liberal Avenger,
Actually you are wrong the guarentees in the constituation apply to citizens, we as a caring nation have just generally extended them to illegal aliens
No, you are wrong.
The protections of the Constitution of the United States of America and the Bill of Rights extend to everyone, with one notable exception:
We don’t allow foreign-born nationals to become the President of the United States.
We may be drawing dangerously close to the police state many of you would like to see, but fortunately, cooler heads have prevailed.
Michelle,
Thanks for staying on top of this.
Liberal avenger,
you are a total moron. The Constitution is a framework that defines what government CAN NOT do to its citizens. Under the Constitution, foreigners have no due process. It’s up to the Executive Branch to determine these matters when dealing with foreigners. I refer you to the preamble of the Constitution:
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
‘The blessings of liberty to OURSELVES and our Posterity…’
Have fun voting for John Kerry this fall. Then you’ll know what being in the minority is really like.
-Respectfully
“Nice comments, Ironbear, but I am convinced that not all of us are in “blogistan.” It’s just too difficult to morph the two words “blog” and “turkey”.
How do we define the place from which the far-libs who enjoy randomly calling names and refusing to be confused by the facts? Blurkey, anyone?” - Blogbat
*ROFL* Thanks. Maybe we can get the Commissar to locate Blurkey on his next mapping project? ;]
Samizdata’s glossary has a nice selection of choice terms we can draw from also. And there’s always “blogweasel”, for blogdom’s equivalent of the forum weasel.
No, you’re right: it’s not all of it from bloggers. But it’s the ones who *are* bloggers, and especially the ones from the conservative/libertarian end of the blogpool that have me a bit annoyed.
You expect blogroaches to ehrmm… what’s the term? Ah “overreact hysterically”. That’s their speciality. ;]