About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

PRESIDENT BUSH’S MEDICARE DEBACLE

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 19, 2004 02:12 AM

There’s more depressing, disgusting news on the Big Government Conservatism front. As is typically the case with government estimates, the Bush administration’s Medicare prescription drug entitlement expansion cost estimates are wrong. In the wrong direction.

The Washington Post reports:

President Bush promised Congress that his Medicare prescription drug benefit would cost no more than $400 billion over 10 years, but once the legislation was enacted, federal actuaries boosted the estimate to $534 billion. Now, Bush administration projections indicate that the cost could be considerably higher.

According to internal White House budget office estimates of the long-term cost of Medicare, spending related to the new drug benefit could increase by $42 billion over the coming decade.

The revised figure appears in a chart prepared during this summer’s “mid-session review” by the Office of Management and Budget and Medicare actuaries. The document provides a detailed breakdown of an extra $176 billion in Medicare spending projected for the next 10 years. The chart, provided to The Washington Post late last week, identifies $42 billion of that increase “as related to MMA,” the initials of the Medicare Modernization Act, the new prescription drug law.

Several budget analysts said the chart indicates that the price tag of the president’s new drug program could total as much as $576 billion over 10 years…

Over the past two weeks, Bush has been buffeted by unfavorable developments in the Medicare program, including the disclosure of a record premium increase next year and revelations that the government concealed other cost projections. Also, the Government Accountability Office ruled that the administration should have withheld the salary of former Medicare chief Thomas A. Scully because he had wrongly prevented a federal employee from providing higher cost estimates on the prescription drug bill to Congress…

NRO’s Deroy Murdock bravely excoriated the White House’s apparent efforts to stifle true cost projections. Here are some the recommendations he made in June, which I heartily endorse:

*HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson also should be summoned to Capitol Hill to explain what he knew, when, and if he discussed any of this with President Bush.

*Ways and Means Chairman Bill Thomas himself indicated he would pursue Administration officials if evidence arose of illegality. “If there was a violation of the law,” he told his committee April 1, “the chair stands ready to use whatever tool is necessary to get to the bottom of the violation of the law.”

*Rank-and-file GOP House and Senate members should caucus with their leaders to determine whether senior Republicans hoodwinked them into voting for the drug benefit on false pretenses. If members of the drug-benefit conference committee and/or Republican floor leaders received and failed to share the Administration’s higher estimates, party backbenchers should remove these untrustworthy colleagues and replace them with others who will not lie to them.

*The United States Department of Justice should conduct a criminal investigation to determine if members of the Bush administration violated any or all of the five federal laws cited above, or additional statutes. Anyone who fooled Congress into buying a brand-new, $534 billion entitlement by pretending it only had a $395-billion price tag should be prosecuted and, if convicted, sentenced to a federal penitentiary for the maximum allowable term.

Democrats complain most loudly about this outrage. Republicans, conservatives, and libertarians, however, should be at least as furious that federal bureaucrats in a GOP administration used coercion and lies to engineer a $534 billion expansion of the welfare state.

Plus $42 billion. For now.

Like I said: Don’t Go There, W.

Posted in: Health care

Add your opinion

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Say Anything
  2. Jeff Blogworthy.com
  3. Rant Fever
  4. Neb's Stream o' Consciousness
  5. Hold The Mayo
  6. Trolling in Shallow Water

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

In Santa Cruz, not all smoke is equal

September 9, 2008 10:57 AM by Michelle Malkin

72 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Dude.

More nosy doctors who don’t like guns

July 8, 2008 05:44 PM by Michelle Malkin

77 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Bad medicine.

Sick: U.S. liver transplants for Japanese gang members

May 30, 2008 08:22 AM by Michelle Malkin

63 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

A health care crime.

It depends on the meaning of “working poor”

March 31, 2008 09:00 PM by Michelle Malkin

24 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Sinking S-CHIP.

In defense of parents with informed vaccine skepticism

March 24, 2008 09:49 PM by Michelle Malkin

68 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Shot in the arm.

The Trojan Horse S-CHIP Republicans

January 23, 2008 08:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments | 1 Trackback

The Hillary health care papers

January 18, 2008 01:28 PM by Michelle Malkin

40 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

“…to expose lifestyles…”

Nanny Bloomberg: Cheez-Its for me, but not for thee

January 11, 2008 10:24 AM by Michelle Malkin

62 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Trans-fat hypocrisy.

How to lose weight like an economist

January 7, 2008 12:30 PM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 0 Trackbacks


Categories: Health care


Riehl World View

» Define "Alternate Reality"

Power Line

» Turkeys on parade