Rush speaks out
Meant to blog this on Friday, but Rush Limbaugh delivered some tough remarks on federal spending and illegal immigration that have grass-roots conservatives buzzing. “We cannot maintain our sovereignty without securing and protecting our borders in an era where terrorists around the world seek entry to this country,” Limbaugh said in his radio monologue.
John Fund writes today about the impact Limbaugh could have in stopping the amnesty insanity proposed by the Bush administration:
Rush has 20 million listeners a week, so if he decides to attack President Bush’s plan to regularize immigration flows through a guest-worker program, he could help kill the idea…
Let’s hope so.
Fund goes on to propose a minimum number of border security-related measures he thinks are needed to mollify grass-roots conservatives appalled at Bush’s open-borders doctrine:
* funding the Border Patrol increases included in the intel reform bill
* adopting measures to combat election fraud by illegal aliens
* amending the motor voter law
* punishing cities that adopt illegal alien sanctuary policies
Fund counsels that “immigration is certainly more complex than many border-control advocates would have you believe.” Yes, well, Fund’s simplistic proposals–he breathes not a word about enforcing federal employer sanctions, toughening employee eligibility verification methods, banning matricula consular cards and other insecure identification, increasing interior enforcement, or fixing the deportation abyss–will hardly make a dent in the problem.
And President Bush’s “plan to regularize immigration flows” will make the problem exponentially worse.
A few years ago, when my first book Invasion was published, Rush generously interviewed me for the Limbaugh Letter. We discussed in-depth the need to treat immigration as a national security issue first and foremost. Rush was concerned with what’s good for America, not simply what’s good for the Republican Party.
Conservatives in the White House would do well to follow Rush’s lead.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Border Patrol, Deportation Abyss, Employer Sanctions, Matricula Consula, Rush Limbaugh
TigerHawk
» Markets, Obama, goose, gander

Power Line
» An appeal not to appeal

JustOneMinute
» James (Not Earl) Jones As National Security Adviser
Belmont Club
» 2025
Patterico
» New York Times: Secretary of State Clinton
Riehl World View
» Observations: Hank Paulson On A Plane

Weekly Standard
» A Run on Guns, Just in Time for the Holidays
Stop The ACLU
» Hillary Clinton Will Say Yes to Secretary of State Job





I saw on Drudge that another the House has a resolution supporting Rush out now, so that’s cool, even though this whole thing has been a waste of time and tax dollars, Rush needs to get out there and demand a hearing anyway. Let him make Reid and Harkin defend their accusations and give it full media coverage. I’d love to see those demoncrap losers scramble, THAT’S worth my tax dollars.
Rush Limbaugh has always respected the troops in the field, not a single time while I was based in Japan in the 1980’s and heard his radio show did I hear derogitory comments about servicemen.
Heard plenty from the Demo-craps though.