About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

WHAT WILL THE VACCINE PUSHERS SAY NOW?

By Michelle Malkin  •  February 26, 2005 07:00 AM

Earlier this month a study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine found no evidence that flu shots reduce deaths among the elderly. This morning brings word from The Lancet that flu shots don’t work at all among another large high-risk group: children under the age of 2. Reuters reports:

There is no evidence that vaccinating children under two-years-old reduces deaths or complications from the illness, researchers say.

Researchers have reviewed 25 studies that looked at the impact of vaccines in reducing the number of cases of influenza and its symptoms in children up to 16.

Children under two are vaccinated against the illness in the United States and Canada.

“Immunisation of very young children is not lent support by our findings,” Dr Tom Jefferson, part of the International Cochrane Collaboration that evaluates medical research, said.

“We recorded no convincing evidence that vaccines can reduce mortality, admissions, serious complications and community transmission of influenza,” he said….

“In young children, below the age of two, we could find no evidence that the vaccine was different from a placebo,” Dr Jefferson said.

Related:

-I first raised questions about the efficacy of flu shots in this post last fall.

-Questions about the value of the Hepatitis B vaccine for young children here.

-Information about contaminated vaccines here.

-Medpundit calls the chickenpox vaccine, now mandatory for Ohio schoolchildren, “[t]he product that makes its own market.”

-Should all schoolchildren be required to get vaccinated for drug addiction?

-Background information about the rotavirus vaccine, which was pulled from the U.S. market a few years ago because of safety concerns, here.

Posted in: Health care

Add your opinion

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Hennessy's View
  2. Sierra Sanity
  3. Truth Is Stranger
  4. Borgard Blog
  5. The Moderate Voice
  6. The Moderate Voice
  7. You Big Mouth, You!

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

In Santa Cruz, not all smoke is equal

September 9, 2008 10:57 AM by Michelle Malkin

72 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Dude.

More nosy doctors who don’t like guns

July 8, 2008 05:44 PM by Michelle Malkin

77 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Bad medicine.

Sick: U.S. liver transplants for Japanese gang members

May 30, 2008 08:22 AM by Michelle Malkin

63 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

A health care crime.

It depends on the meaning of “working poor”

March 31, 2008 09:00 PM by Michelle Malkin

24 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Sinking S-CHIP.

In defense of parents with informed vaccine skepticism

March 24, 2008 09:49 PM by Michelle Malkin

68 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Shot in the arm.

The Trojan Horse S-CHIP Republicans

January 23, 2008 08:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments | 1 Trackback

The Hillary health care papers

January 18, 2008 01:28 PM by Michelle Malkin

40 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

“…to expose lifestyles…”

Nanny Bloomberg: Cheez-Its for me, but not for thee

January 11, 2008 10:24 AM by Michelle Malkin

62 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Trans-fat hypocrisy.

How to lose weight like an economist

January 7, 2008 12:30 PM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 0 Trackbacks


Categories: Health care


Belmont Club

» 2025