About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

TOO IMPORTANT FOR PRISON?

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 4, 2005 09:44 AM

You’re not going to believe this one. From Elmer Smith in the Philadelphia Daily News:

[Tracy] McIntosh pleaded no contest to a charge that he forced himself on his semi-conscious victim while she was sick and groggy from liquor and drugs that he allegedly slipped into one of her drinks.

But then he threw himself on the mercy of a court that was more merciful to him than he was to his victim and more merciful than it would have been with most sexual predators, I suspect.

Unlike most sexual predators, this one faced a judge who took judicial notice of his important work with victims of stroke and brain injuries. McIntosh, a former Fulbright scholar, was director of Penn’s Head Injury Research Center when he assaulted his victim.

Means, apparently impressed by McIntosh’s credentials, ignored sentencing guidelines calling for five-11 years in prison and placed him under house arrest for up to two years plus 12 years’ probation.

The victim in the case had begged Judge Means to send McIntosh to jail.

“By raping me, he took something from me that I will never get back,” she said. “It will affect me for the rest of my life, and I don’t want this to happen to other women.”

In explaining his decision, Means said he “factored in McIntosh’s important work with stroke victims and brain injuries,” according to the Daily News.

McIntosh is considered one of the best brain researchers in the world. His research on stem cells has the potential to help people with spinal-cord injuries.

But that shouldn’t matter in a court of law. McIntosh did the crime; he should do some time.

District Attorney Lynne Abraham, agrees. Yesterday she said she will file a motion of reconsideration of sentence.

“Nobody is ‘too important’ for prison,” Abraham said. “This is a crime that clearly deserves prison time.”

(Hat tip: reader Richard Davis)

Posted in: Double standards

Add your opinion

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Down with Absolutes!
  2. Simply Kimberly
  3. Imago Dei
  4. Error Theory
  5. Frog's House of Infinite Wisdom
  6. Impleader.com
  7. EphBlog
  8. Zibibbo is Good
  9. EphBlog
  10. celebrex online
  11. micro bikinis skimpy bikini teen teeny bikini skimpy bikini contest string bikini contests g string bikinis
  12. bathroom voyeur dressing room voyeur free voyeur photos 23 voyeur pics voyeur teen free voyeur pics voyeur cam

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Unhinged losers: Prop. 8 opponents threaten Mormons and Catholics

November 7, 2008 11:06 AM by Michelle Malkin

331 Comments | 40 Trackbacks

(Photo source: Yahoo! News)

Conyers calls for investigation into Aunti Zeituni info leak; Joe the Plumber still on his own

November 1, 2008 11:25 PM by Michelle Malkin

152 Comments | 39 Trackbacks

Double standards and unanswered questions.

Can you imagine if an Obama effigy were hung from a noose?

October 27, 2008 11:51 AM by Michelle Malkin

100 Comments | 24 Trackbacks

Decode this.

Operation Destroy Joe the Plumber

October 17, 2008 12:02 AM by Michelle Malkin

332 Comments | 118 Trackbacks

The rage that’s not on your front page

October 15, 2008 10:46 AM by Michelle Malkin

75 Comments | 15 Trackbacks

“Stink bomb.”

Liberal women still mobbing Sarah Palin and her family

October 14, 2008 06:28 PM by Michelle Malkin

244 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Bitch and moan.

More Democratic rage not on the front page

October 13, 2008 05:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

80 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

“I didn’t even realize it was going to be like this.”


Categories: Double standards


Belmont Club

» 2025