About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

HOME MATTERS: THE DAY AFTER

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 24, 2005 08:19 AM

The (right side of the) blogosphere’s response to yesterday’s SCOTUS ruling on Kelo v. New London has been stunning. And heartening. Eminent domain isn’t usually the first thing that comes to mind when one thinks “blogswarm.” But the fierce reaction to the decision shows that core economic liberty issues can still unite disparate factions of the right (South Park cons, neocons, Schiavo-cons, whatever-cons) who have been fretting about a conservative crack-up.

My wonk-ish hope is that more attention will be paid to bogus community redevelopment/urban blight eradication/tax increment-financing schemes masquerading as “public use” projects. In the New London case, the private corporate beneficiary was Pfizer, the pharmaceutical giant. In Seattle, it was Nordstrom (reg reqd). Across the country, it’s money-losing multiplexes and luxury stadium deals. In all cases, the losers are taxpayers, homeowners, and small businesses.

N.Z. Bear has created a Kelo topic page to track blog posts related to the ruling.

The Wall Street Journal weighs in on the Supreme Court’s reverse Robin Hoods.

George Will has an eloquent column today decrying the ruling. His credibility is undermined by his silence on government land grabs for his beloved baseball stadiums.

But Will’s credibility is not nearly as eroded as that of New York Times liberals, who either have nothing to say about the case or who support the decision to strip ” a few small property owners” of their dreams–an outcome they might undoubtedly decry if not for their company’s own vested interested in protecting such rights-trampling boondoggles.

Posted in: Supreme Court

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The Supreme Court steps in to help illegal alien visa overstayers

June 16, 2008 11:41 AM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Open-borders majority.

California goes to the polls today on Kelo–or does it? (UPDATE: dang.)

June 3, 2008 01:39 AM by see-dubya

49 Comments | 1 Trackback

Eminent domain imminent? Try a yes on 98. PLUS: Eminent domain v. illegal aliens–which do conservatives support?

Bench marks: McCain, the GOP, and judges

May 6, 2008 10:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

55 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Order in the court.

“I was the black pinata.”

October 1, 2007 07:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

59 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Clarence Thomas speaks.

Justice John Roberts hospitalized

July 30, 2007 05:54 PM by Michelle Malkin

44 Comments | 20 Trackbacks

Update: The Left gloats.

Chuckie Schumer admits: He’s an idiot…more: “There is no doubt that we were hoodwinked”

July 27, 2007 07:45 PM by Michelle Malkin

92 Comments | 18 Trackbacks

Dems play the “dupe” card. Plus: A Bobby Byrd flashback and a reminder of the SCOTUS hearing circus.

Who would the Dems put on the Supreme Court?

July 12, 2007 02:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

23 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Summer of speculation.


Categories: Supreme Court


David Frum

» Why Bother?

Confederate Yankee

» Organize This