About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

SCOTUS PICK: WHO WILL IT BE?

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 30, 2005 08:16 PM

Fox News reporting tonight that the White House will announce its SCOTUS pick tomorrow.

Washington Post
, A1 for Monday:

President Bush appears poised to announce a new Supreme Court nomination today, moving quickly after a weekend of consultations to put forward a replacement for the ill-fated choice of Harriet Miers in hopes of recapturing political momentum, according to Republicans close to the White House.

Judging by the names the White House floated by its political allies in recent days, Bush seems ready to pick a candidate with a long track record of conservative jurisprudence who would mollify the Republican base that scuttled the Miers nomination. Several GOP strategists said the most likely choice seemed to be federal appeals Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr., with fellow Judges J. Michael Luttig and Alice M. Batchelder also seen in the running.

Real Clear Politics has a round-up of SCOTUS vacancy news (see right sidebar).

SCOTUS Blog looks at front-runners.

Reuters/WaPo on Alito and Luttig.


The Prowler
hears it will be Judge Samuel Alito. So does Erick at Confirm Them.

Todd Zywicki hears Luttig, and and also points to Ideoblog’s analysis of Alito’s business and commercial law jurisprudence.

Patterico takes a closer look at Alito’s dissent in Casey.

Hugh Hewitt supports Luttig and underscores his War on Terror rulings. More background here.

Stay tuned…

Add your opinion

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. AnalPhilosopher
  2. FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog
  3. Half The Politics
  4. Conservative Outpost
  5. Holstein Grove
  6. JammedGun
  7. Stop The ACLU
  8. California Conservative
  9. Generation Why?
  10. Stuck On Stupid
  11. Small Town Veteran
  12. The Political Pit Bull
  13. Right Minded
  14. Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator
  15. The Truth Laid Bear
  16. amoixcillikn
  17. kell flast
  18. eplvssonf

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

What Palin should have said to Couric about the Supreme Court

October 2, 2008 10:04 AM by Michelle Malkin

108 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

“Off the top of my head, no.”

The Supreme Court steps in to help illegal alien visa overstayers

June 16, 2008 11:41 AM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Open-borders majority.

California goes to the polls today on Kelo–or does it? (UPDATE: dang.)

June 3, 2008 01:39 AM by see-dubya

49 Comments | 1 Trackback

Eminent domain imminent? Try a yes on 98. PLUS: Eminent domain v. illegal aliens–which do conservatives support?

Bench marks: McCain, the GOP, and judges

May 6, 2008 10:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

55 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Order in the court.

“I was the black pinata.”

October 1, 2007 07:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

59 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Clarence Thomas speaks.

Justice John Roberts hospitalized

July 30, 2007 05:54 PM by Michelle Malkin

44 Comments | 20 Trackbacks

Update: The Left gloats.

Chuckie Schumer admits: He’s an idiot…more: “There is no doubt that we were hoodwinked”

July 27, 2007 07:45 PM by Michelle Malkin

92 Comments | 18 Trackbacks

Dems play the “dupe” card. Plus: A Bobby Byrd flashback and a reminder of the SCOTUS hearing circus.


Categories: Harriet Miers, Supreme Court


Weekly Standard

» Rolled by Roland?