About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

WHAT IS PAT LEAHY TALKING ABOUT? (VIDEO)

By Michelle Malkin  •  February 6, 2006 07:25 AM

On Face the Nation yesterday morning, Sen. Patrick Leahy added his name to the list of conspiratorial Democrats who imply that “the Bush Administration” had advance knowledge of the 9/11 terrorist attacks:

The Bush Administration knew the names of the hijackers before 9/11. They did nothing on it. I want to make sure they do it right.

leahypic.jpg

Download the video (.wmv file)

Check out Bob Schieffer’s tough follow-up:

Alright. To be continued tomorrow morning at that hearing on Capitol Hill and we’ll be back with our roundtable.

Seriously. What on earth is Leahy talking about? Was he referring to Able Danger? (And if so, how does he square his support of that data mining program with the Dems’ unhinged opposition to the NSA terrorist surveillance program?) Or was he referring to some other classified information?

Were there signs missed? Yes. Information-sharing failures? Yes. Dots unconnected? Plenty. But “Bush Knew” and “did nothing?” Leahy’s glib pandering to the Dean/McKinney faction of the Democratic Party must be challenged.

Betsy Newmark adds:

I’ve never seen that we knew the names of the hijackers before 9/11. And, of course, we didn’t know that they were hijackers until they did. And if we had known, what could we have done? Isn’t that the whole business about the Gorelick Wall that would have prevented such information from getting to authorities in time? This is also just the kind of situation that the NSA surveillance program would cover now, but wasn’t in effect before 9/11.

This is a totally irresponsible claim by Senator Leahy and I hope that the media calls him on it and asks him what he meant by that. But, I have little hope that they will.

Yup.

(Hat tip: Ian Schwartz.)

***

Reader Dan H. writes:

In addition to the one you already pointed out, he slipped in another whopper.

“Well, everybody wants to stop another attack. I mean, obviously, the Bush Administration, the first attack happened on their watch. They don’t want a second one on their watch.”

Really? That will come as a surprise to the victims of the first WTC bombings, the embassy bombings, and the USS Cole bombing. Naturally, Bob Schieffer gave him a pass on that.

Posted in: Uncategorized

Add your opinion

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Scipio the Metalcon
  2. The Strata-Sphere
  3. NoisyRoom.net
  4. Ed Driscoll.com
  5. amxiclilin

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The MSM, Gaza, and PJTV

January 7, 2009 11:31 AM by Michelle Malkin

19 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

First hate mail of 2009

January 1, 2009 12:04 PM by Michelle Malkin

191 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

See-Dubya’s New Year’s Resolutions

January 1, 2009 12:59 AM by see-dubya

34 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Help a brother out.

Predictions for the New Year

December 31, 2008 06:16 PM by Michelle Malkin

87 Comments | 1 Trackback

Where in the world

December 31, 2008 12:50 PM by Michelle Malkin

40 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

President Chesty McCheesecake

December 29, 2008 07:10 PM by Michelle Malkin

87 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Where in the world

December 26, 2008 06:36 AM by Michelle Malkin

9 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Enough with the Barack beach porn

December 23, 2008 12:39 PM by Michelle Malkin

132 Comments | 11 Trackbacks


Categories: Uncategorized


TigerHawk

» ME History

Weekly Standard

» Rolled by Roland?