About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

NEW COMEDY CENTRAL LOGOS

By Michelle Malkin  •  April 13, 2006 07:08 PM

***scroll for new entries and updates***

Blogger Jay Inman e-mails his submission:

dhimcentral.jpg

Damian Penny dubs the network: “Cowardly Central.”

From Patrick at Clarity & Resolve:

comcentralmo.jpg

From reader Ray:

comcentralmo002.jpg

From almighty Allah Pundit:

comcentralmo003.jpg

Another from Allah Pundit–and the frontrunner, IMO:

comcentralmo004.jpg

From Dan Riehl:

southparkmo002.jpg

Chicago Ray has another.

***

Meanwhile, Shawn Wasson has a video clip of what may be the uncensored South Park episode (see update…probably bogus):

southparkmo.jpg

(A Volokh Conspiracy commenter thinks it may be fake.)

***750pm EDT Update: Brendan Loy has a persuasive analysis that the video is fake. And I’ve heard from one source who says he is a South Park animator that the clip is fake.***

More from Allah Pundit:

comcentralfake.jpg
(Click on image for full-size detail.)

The top image is from the actual broadcast. Note how the line around the fish’s mouth is unbroken. Note too the rear part of the fish, how it’s foregrounded against the Family Guy’s flesh tone and toga.

Now look at the first fake image. See that bit of excess light coloring near the rear part of the fish? That’s a Photoshop artefact. The faker needed to show Mohammed carrying the helmet across the threshold, but there was no footage of that in the original broadcast; he had to make it from scratch. What he probably did was to take the top image, where the helmet is already in Family Guy’s hands, and then use the lasso tool in Photoshop to draw a line around it. Then he could copy it, shrink it, and transplant it to a prior frame for placement in Mohammed’s hands. The problem is, his line-drawing was sloppy: he inadvertently captured a bit of that background flesh tone and toga when using the lasso tool and then forgot to erase it before posting the video. If the clip were real, there would have been no reason for that bit of coloring to be there.

Now look at the second image. The line around the fish’s mouth is broken. Why would that be true in the uncensored clip (if it were real) and not the clip that was actually broadcast? Again, it’s probably because of sloppy Photoshopping: the faker had to create a new layer from the helmet in order to foreground it against Mohammed’s body. He probably zoomed in to do touch-ups to the new layer, to make sure the colors looked nice and even for plausibility’s sake, and an errant brush stroke broke the line around the mouth. Again, wouldn’t/shouldn’t have happened if the clip were real.

One more piece of evidence, this one a bit more tenuous but still worth noting. Compare Mohammed’s voice from the 2001 episode to the voice in the fake clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URtNqCDymrk&search=south%20park

Doesn’t sound the same to me. Of course, that’s hardly a smoking gun, but Trey Parker and Matt Stone voice most of their characters, so assuming one of them voiced Mohammed in ‘01, it should have sounded similar in the uncensored clip. It doesn’t to my ears, but YMMV.

And another thing — you can see Family Guy’s fingers at the back of the helmet in the real image. In the same image, at the bottom, you can’t see them anymore. Why? Because the faker didn’t include them in his lasso crop when he was creating the new layer for the helmet.

Think of it this way: if the fake clip were real, and the South Park staff had to airbrush Mohammed out of the scene after it was already created, would they really have gone to the trouble of drawing in FG’s fingers at the back of the helmet? After they had already decided not to draw them in the uncensored clip? Makes no sense.

***

And this: MTV, owned by Comedy Central’s parent company Viacom, plans to broadcast a cartoon lampooning the pope and Vatican hierarchy. Hat tip: Newsbusters.

***

Flashback…Our future is dhimmitude.

Posted in: Uncategorized

Add your opinion

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Freedom for Some
  2. Balance Sheet
  3. Ed Driscoll.com
  4. A Tic In The Mind's Eye
  5. Rhymes With Right
  6. Adam's Blog
  7. Blue Star Chronicles
  8. Freedom Watch
  9. Tonyr's Blog
  10. California Conservative
  11. SAMMENHOLD
  12. Strategic Outlook Institute - Weblog
  13. Riehl World View
  14. Conservative Cat
  15. Hyscience
  16. discarded lies - hyperlinkopotamus
  17. The World According To Carl
  18. The Right Nation
  19. Physics Geek
  20. MoveOnAndShutUp.org
  21. Blogger Ale
  22. Ace of Spades HQ
  23. Cake or Death
  24. Classical Values
  25. Pharyngula
  26. Uncommon Sense
  27. acycsslovir

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Creed’s Scott Stapp supports the troops

September 29, 2008 08:43 PM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Tell all your friends: FactCheck.org is useless

September 23, 2008 03:09 PM by Michelle Malkin

89 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Saturday open thread

September 20, 2008 02:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

247 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Sunday open thread

September 14, 2008 11:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

366 Comments | 1 Trackback

Sunday open thread

September 7, 2008 11:39 AM by Michelle Malkin

406 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

My favorite new bumper sticker

August 31, 2008 10:30 PM by Michelle Malkin

84 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

Andrew Sullivan jumps in on Palin’s grandma-gate rumor

August 31, 2008 10:16 PM by see-dubya

140 Comments | 17 Trackbacks

It’s this year’s “Dick Cheney’s Gay Daughter”. UPDATE: “Fair Game,” then and now.

Introducing PJTV

August 29, 2008 04:42 PM by Michelle Malkin

19 Comments | 1 Trackback


Categories: Uncategorized


Belmont Club

» The second debate

JustOneMinute

» The Debate!