About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Hezbollah’s favorite newspaper

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 22, 2006 11:20 AM

Anonymous blabbers and their stenographers at the NYTimes are at it again:

The Bush administration is rushing a delivery of precision-guided bombs to Israel, which requested the expedited shipment last week after beginning its air campaign against Hezbollah targets in Lebanon, American officials said Friday.

The decision to quickly ship the weapons to Israel was made with relatively little debate within the Bush administration, the officials said. Its disclosure threatens to anger Arab governments and others because of the appearance that the United States is actively aiding the Israeli bombing campaign in a way that could be compared to Iran’s efforts to arm and resupply Hezbollah.

Reader Thomas W. writes: “Michelle, the NYT is doing it again. Throwing one of our best allies under the bus, and openly disclosing future military war plans against our enemies.” He sends a screen cap of the story:

heznyt002.jpg

And adds: “What’s the difference between that and this?”

heznyt003.jpg

“All in the Public Interest, right?”

More info on the leakers:

The new American arms shipment to Israel has not been announced publicly, and the officials who described the administration’s decision to rush the munitions to Israel would discuss it only after being promised anonymity. The officials included employees of two government agencies, and one described the shipment as just one example of a broad array of armaments that the United States has long provided Israel.

Who are the blabbermouths? Howell Raines gave a clue at an Aspen Institute talk yesterday:

One audience member asked about the role of media leaks. Raines opted not to go in-depth since he no longer is a working journalist, but offered a bit of a leak of his own:

“Almost all leakers are lawyers. That’s the bottom line.”

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Treasury Dep’t: Chavez’s government is funding and assisting Hezbollah

July 7, 2008 02:59 PM by see-dubya

25 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Important? Very.
Surprising? Not very.

The New York Times reveals the name of KSM’s interrogator, over the CIA’s wishes

June 22, 2008 10:22 AM by see-dubya

86 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

Here’s how the Times says “thanks for your service…”

Hey, Associated Press: You owe me at least $132,125!

June 17, 2008 10:37 PM by Michelle Malkin

87 Comments | 56 Trackbacks

Turn the tables.

The NYT should swallow its own medicine

June 17, 2008 10:57 AM by Michelle Malkin

41 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Do as they say…

Berlusconi testifies in Abu Omar rendition case

May 14, 2008 02:11 PM by see-dubya

18 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Just ignore the Saddam-terror connection, okay?

Hooking a fishy NYTimes reporter

May 8, 2008 07:58 PM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

America’s fishwrap of record.

Dick Cavett: yet another liberal dazzled by Petraeus’ shiny medals

April 12, 2008 10:33 PM by see-dubya

88 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

“Very impressive…if you’re twelve”.

Some unintentional truth at the New York Times

April 7, 2008 02:01 PM by see-dubya

28 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

That’s Rich!

Blogging Yourself to Death?

April 5, 2008 08:21 PM by see-dubya

35 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Occupational Hazards


Categories: Hezbollah, New York Times


Marginal Revolution

» What is mystery ingredient X?