About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Border games

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 14, 2006 09:14 PM

Yes, I know. The House voted to approve a 700-mile fence at the southern border. Press release:

Speaker of the House J. Dennis Hastert (R-IL) today issued the following statement after passage of H.R. 6061, Secure Fence Act of 2006. The bill passed 283-138-1 with 131 Democrats voting against the measure.

“Every year, nearly one million illegal immigrants cross into America. This is a clear threat to our safety. Some of these people are coming for work, but countless others are drug dealers, gang members and some are even terrorists. That is why building this fence is common sense. And if we build the fence, it will be harder for them to come here illegally.

“It should concern the American people that 131 Democrats voted against creating this security fence along our southern border. They don’t want border security; instead they would rather jeopardize our national security and put Americans at risk.

That’s all true. But forgive me if I don’t break out the pom-poms over this. There’s no funding for the fence, which will take years to build if it ever does get funded. There are so many other immediate reforms that could have been adopted this year that would have strengthened immigration enforcement, closed deportation loopholes immediately, and provided true relief at the border. (And don’t even get me started on this administration’s renewed laxity at the front door, which has been thrown open to tens of thousands of new Saudi student visa holders while enforcement against millions of current visa overstayers remain virtually non-existent.)

The 700-mile fence vote is an election season gesture, and grass-roots conservatives who have watched the GOP squander away this issue afor six years are not going to be appeased by mid-September 2006 gesture politics.

Posted in: Southern Border

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Scottish Right
  2. Old War Dogs
  3. DeMediacratic Nation
  4. Robinik.net
  5. La Shawn Barber's Corner
  6. CommonSenseAmerica
  7. Obi's Sister
  8. Sma' Talk Wi' T
  9. NoisyRoom.net
  10. stikNstein....has no mercy
  11. Right Voices
  12. Mary Katharine Ham
  13. Mary Katharine Ham
  14. Mary Katharine Ham
  15. Mary Katharine Ham
  16. Mary Katharine Ham
  17. Mary Katharine Ham
  18. Mary Katharine Ham
  19. Mary Katharine Ham
  20. Blog furniture 1164071653
  21. akeruxzhs

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Relax, border hawks…Virtual Fence 2.0 is on the way!

June 25, 2008 07:44 AM by see-dubya

30 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Be still my beating heart…

Drug traffickers’ assassins linked to illegal immigration cartel?

June 24, 2008 07:06 AM by see-dubya

25 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

I’ve got a bad feeling about this.

AZ protesters attempt to shut down Sheriff Joe Arpaio

June 21, 2008 06:38 AM by see-dubya

101 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

How DARE a law enforcement officer enforce the law!

Photo of the morning

June 3, 2008 10:25 AM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 1 Trackback

Collision course.

Drug-Lord Ping Pong

June 3, 2008 08:33 AM by see-dubya

13 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Back and forth and back and…oops…

U.S. developing radiation detectors for the Mexican border

May 19, 2008 12:34 AM by see-dubya

54 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Now why would they need those?

Smugglers recruiting another elite spec-ops unit

April 28, 2008 03:39 PM by see-dubya

19 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

A tale of two fences.


Categories: Southern Border


Belmont Club

» Pirouette

iowahawk

» A Clarification

protein wisdom

» Homophobia? [Dan Collins]