A Ca-lame response
NYTimes ombudsman Byron Calame: (Not) looking out for you
A few days ago, I asked NYTimes public editor Byron Calame to explain exactly what he meant when he complained about the Bush administration’s “vicious criticism” of the newspaper’s reckless decision to expose a top-secret terrorist banking data surveillance program. I received a response this afternoon. You will be as underwhelmed as I am, I’m sure:
Translation: It’s so “amply documented” I don’t need to bother citing any of it to you. Trademark arrogance from the newspaper of wreckage.
Thanks for the response!
***
Previous:
Follow-up questions for Byron Calame and the Times’ Bush-bashing allies
NYTimes editor now admits: We were wrong to blab
The blabbermouths backpedal
The newspaper of wreckage
Why they blabbed: It’s the arrogance
How about a nice big glass of…
More blabbermouth posters
Messages for the blabbermouths
Backlash against the blabbermouths
NYTimes blabbermouths strike again
The terrorist-tipping Times
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: New York Times
The Sundries Shack
» “Drive small cars and wait for the wind.”The Sundries Shack
» Just Call McCain “The Imaginer”.The Sundries Shack
» Go, Mount Shasta! Go Mount Shasta! Go, Mount Shasta, Gooooo!protein wisdom
» G. K. Chesterton on the political corner-cutting of socialists…(The Sanity Inspector)protein wisdom
» While You Were Shopping [Dan Collins]Marginal Revolution
» What is mystery ingredient X?Weekly Standard
» CNN Poll: Gas Prices a Top Issue for VotersNewsBusters.org
» Chgo Trib's 'Honor Killing' Report Omits Islam Connection
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
Trackback URL