About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

The $54 million pants suit

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 12, 2007 09:10 PM

That wacky lawsuit involving a D.C. judge who took a dry cleaner to court over his lost pants has gone to trial:

A Washington, D.C. law judge broke down in tears and had to take a break from his testimony because he became too emotional while questioning himself about his experience with a missing pair of pants.

Administrative law judge Roy Pearson is representing himself in civil court and claimed that he is owed $54 million from a local dry cleaner who he says lost his pants, despite a sign in their store which ensures “Satisfaction Guaranteed.”

In his opening statement, Pearson said the case looks at the culture that allows a “group of defendants to engage in bad business practices for five years,” according to ABC affiliate WJLA.

But as he explained the details of the missing pants, Pearson struggled to get through his hour and a half of testimony and had to leave the stand at one point because he was so emotional.

The case gained national attention soon after the lawsuit was filed. The pants are expected to be introduced into evidence, although the judge says the pants are not his, and the correct pants are still missing.

The sartorial loss caused Pearson to suffer what he calls severe “mental suffering, inconvenience and discomfort.”

The defendants, who own Custom Cleaners in the Fort Lincoln section of the district, told ABC News last month that they, too, are feeling inconvenience and discomfort.

They are expected to present their case Wednesday.

Overlawyered has more.

Posted in: Uncategorized

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Tammi's World
  2. RightWingDuck

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On June 22nd, 2007 at 4:11 pm, theroc5156 said:

    Disbar this ass

  2. #2
    On June 22nd, 2007 at 10:26 pm, steveegg said:

    If he gets that $54 million, I wonder what we’d have to raise for somebody to “accidentally” lose Old Crusty.

  3. #3
    On June 25th, 2007 at 11:23 am, Bob68 said:

    Question for the general readership: Can the jury come back with a ‘No case for the plaintiff?” i.e. frivolous suit, then award the defendants all costs including their time, lawyer fee’s, mental anguish etc? This suit is really the reason that Ihave never sued anyone. I have always been able to work out my differences without a lawyer. God the system has become so corrupt.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The Case Against Indiana Jones

May 22, 2008 02:09 AM by see-dubya

58 Comments | 1 Trackback

And a brief for the defense.

Palestinians throw Osama under the bus

May 20, 2008 12:41 AM by see-dubya

24 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

The Fickle Finger of Fatah.

Weekend open thread

May 18, 2008 01:53 PM by Michelle Malkin

181 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Gather ’round.

Obligatory Silky hearts Obambi post

May 15, 2008 09:11 AM by Michelle Malkin

62 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

19.

Liberal intolerance watch: Columbia, Md.

May 13, 2008 09:58 AM by Michelle Malkin

87 Comments | 1 Trackback

Persecution.

The Thomas Kinkade of transgressive art

May 12, 2008 04:33 PM by see-dubya

50 Comments | 1 Trackback

I’m (yawn) shocked.

Monday morning inspiration

May 12, 2008 08:39 AM by Michelle Malkin

32 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

“One day at a time.”


Categories: Uncategorized


TPMmuckraker

» Our Old Friend

TPMmuckraker

» Toxic

TPM

» Toxic

JustOneMinute

» Presidential Meetings

Weekly Standard

» Clinton Loses, the Movie

Weekly Standard

» Hillary Said What?

Weekly Standard

» Surveying the Polls